KFC
- 477
- 4
Suppose I have a equation of the form
F(x, k) = G(x, k)
which is unsolvable analytically. We apply the method of pertubtaion (k is small quantity) and let the first order solution approximated as
x = x^{(0)} + kx^{(1)}
we need to put this back to the equation and find out x^{(1)}. If after substitution, F(x, k) will only give constant term or term with k and G(x, k) will give some extra terms of order k^2. For example,
F(x, k) = ax^{(0)} + bkx^{(1)}
and
G(x, k) = cx^{(0)} + dkx^{(1)} + h k^2 (x^{(0)}-x^{(1)})
shall I directly drop the high-order term or let the coefficient of the high-order term to zero? For the later one, we will introduce another condition to solve the equation (seems not correct!?)
F(x, k) = G(x, k)
which is unsolvable analytically. We apply the method of pertubtaion (k is small quantity) and let the first order solution approximated as
x = x^{(0)} + kx^{(1)}
we need to put this back to the equation and find out x^{(1)}. If after substitution, F(x, k) will only give constant term or term with k and G(x, k) will give some extra terms of order k^2. For example,
F(x, k) = ax^{(0)} + bkx^{(1)}
and
G(x, k) = cx^{(0)} + dkx^{(1)} + h k^2 (x^{(0)}-x^{(1)})
shall I directly drop the high-order term or let the coefficient of the high-order term to zero? For the later one, we will introduce another condition to solve the equation (seems not correct!?)