How to Solve for Velocity with Quadratic and Linear Drag Forces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for velocity under the influence of linear and quadratic drag forces using Newton's second law. The initial equation derived is F = m(dv/dt) = -bv - cv², leading to the integral dt = dv / (-bv - cv²). A participant suggests using partial fractions to simplify the integral, which ultimately leads to a corrected expression for time in terms of velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying calculus techniques, such as the chain rule and integration by parts, to arrive at the final solution for velocity as a function of time. The thread emphasizes the analytical approach to solving complex drag force equations.
Col.Buendia
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
An object is coasting on the horizontal axis, in the positive direction and is subject to a drag force f = -bv - cv^{2}.
Write down Newton's 2nd Law and solve for v using separation of variables.

So first I wrote out Newton's law as:
F= m(dv/dt) = -bv - cv^{2}

Solving the integral: dt = \frac{dv}{-bv-cv^{2}}, with boundaries from 0 to t and v(0) to v

I got: t = \frac{-m}{b} ln\frac{v}{1+\frac{c}{b}v^{2}}

Note: I haven't put in my boundaries on v yet. However, Once I put in my boundaries on v and try to rearrange to solve for v, I can't get anywhere. Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated.

Thx, CB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure about the ln? If I differentiate it, I first get
\frac{ 1 + (c/b) v^2 }{ v }
times the derivative of that (chain rule!) which will be something like (... - ...) / v^2
in total giving me something containing 1/v^3.

If you want to do it analytically, you could try writing
\frac{-dv}{v} \frac{1}{b + c v}
as
\left( \frac{A}{v} + \frac{B}{b + c v}\right) dv
with A and B constants (which, in this case, works). Then split the integral and solve both parts separately.
 
Well looks like I made an error in my calculations: the integral turns out to be :
t =\frac{-m}{b} \frac{1}{b + c v} ln\frac{v}{1+\frac{c}{b}v}

And yes, using partial fractions will also solve this integral, and yes a ln function will turn out to be there.

Anyway, then the solution is solved for just rearranging for v in terms of t.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top