How to Solve Inverse Laplace Transform: Factor or Use Complex Methods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eurekameh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Laplace
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of solving the inverse Laplace transform, specifically comparing the effectiveness of factoring versus using complex methods. The original poster attempted a more complex method on an exam, resulting in incorrect coefficients and a loss of points, while factoring would have yielded a simpler solution. Responses suggest that while the complex method was not fully correct, the effort demonstrated knowledge of partial fraction decomposition. It is recommended to seek partial credit from the professor due to the understanding shown, despite the incorrect final answer. The importance of recognizing the simpler factoring method for such problems is emphasized.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
2i734o0.png

I have to take the inverse laplace transform of the above function. Now, I know that I can factor (s^2+5s+6) as (s+3)(s+2) and take the easy way out. However, I did it as above on a test, getting A = -1, B = -1, and C = 1. I then took the inverse laplace transform and got something involving cosh's and sinh's. Doing it the easy way would have gotten you just the exponential e. This problem on the exam was maybe 30+ points and I got 0 points for this problem because I did not realize to factor (s^2+5s+6) and did it the way more complicated way. Is my method justified and most importantly, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method looks alright (so far), but you don't get the values you stated for A, B & C. Zero marks out of 30 seems a bit harsh though, as you at least demonstrated that you know partial fraction decomposition can be used for this. I'd talk to your professor to see if you can't get some partial credit for that at least.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K