How to Solve Physics Electromagnetism Problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving three physics electromagnetism problems, with participants seeking guidance on equations and concepts. Key points include using Faraday's law to calculate induced emf from the change in magnetic flux and understanding the relationship between current, voltage, and resistance. Participants also discuss the direction of acceleration and the application of Lenz's Law to determine the behavior of magnetic fields in response to moving magnets. Clarifications are made regarding the flow of current and the effects of magnetic fields on induced emf. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the fundamental principles of electromagnetism to solve these problems effectively.
seiferseph
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I have 3 more physics electromagnetism problems, thanks again for the help (helped tremendously in the last unit for my test).

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y15/seiferseph/1.jpg

not sure what equation to use, i can solve for change in flux using the magnetic field and area, but not sure how to get induced emf (which would help me get current)


http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y15/seiferseph/2.jpg

how do i get the direction of the acceleration?


http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y15/seiferseph/3.jpg

not sure what to do here, i thought you use lenz's law where it creates a counter b field against the motion of the bar magnet, but that doesn't work for the bottom.

thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seiferseph said:
I have 3 more physics electromagnetism problems, thanks again for the help (helped tremendously in the last unit for my test).

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y15/seiferseph/1.jpg

not sure what equation to use, i can solve for change in flux using the magnetic field and area, but not sure how to get induced emf (which would help me get current)


http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y15/seiferseph/2.jpg

how do i get the direction of the acceleration?


http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y15/seiferseph/3.jpg

not sure what to do here, i thought you use lenz's law where it creates a counter b field against the motion of the bar magnet, but that doesn't work for the bottom.

thanks again!

For the first one, the induced emf depends on the rate of change of the magnetic flux. Review Faraday's law. Since current depends on the emf, and current is the rate of charge flow, you will find a connection between the flux change and the amount of charge.

The second is just the force on a current carrying wire in a magnetic field.

For the last, review Lenz's Law and the right hand rule for fields produced by moving charges.
 
OlderDan said:
The second is just the force on a current carrying wire in a magnetic field.

For the last, review Lenz's Law and the right hand rule for fields produced by moving charges.

ok, for the first i solve for change in flux, then multiply by number of turns to get emf. then i use I = V/R and get 0.06 A for the current. why is that the same as the charge? and doesn't the formula for emf use time as well?


for the second one, the b-field is up and current left, so i get the force going into the page, how does that make it go right?

for the 3rd, it creates a counter b field at each point opposite, so doesn't it make a north at the top (to keep it there) and a south at bottom (to oppose)? that's the opposite of the answer.
 
Last edited:
seiferseph said:
ok, for the first i solve for change in flux, then multiply by number of turns to get emf. then i use I = V/R and get 0.06 A for the current. why is that the same as the charge? and doesn't the formula for emf use time as well?


for the second one, the b-field is up and current left, so i get the force going into the page, how does that make it go right?

for the 3rd, it creates a counter b field at each point opposite, so doesn't it make a north at the top (to keep it there) and a south at bottom (to oppose)? that's the opposite of the answer.

Assume you change the flux at a constant rate, and it takes time T to make the change. That will produce a constant emf for that time, and a constant current will flow that is proportional to the magnitude of the emf. The current is the charge that flows divided by the time it takes to flow, or T

|emf| = change in flux/T
|I| = |emf|/R = charge/T

Same time on both sides of the equation, so...

For the second, how do you get current to the left? Current is into the page for the moveable bar. The rails are stationary.

For the last one, think in terms of flux. The bottom is trying to increase the flux downward (field lines getting closer together- field strength increasing), so the induced emf has to produce a flux upward (magnetic field points upward. The top is decreasing the flux downward (field lines getting farther apart- field strength decreasing), so the induced emf has to increase the flux downward.

In terms of North and South, the bottom has to repel the falling magnet and the top has to attract it. The induced field must have "north" below pointing upward and above pointing downward.
 
OlderDan said:
Assume you change the flux at a constant rate, and it takes time T to make the change. That will produce a constant emf for that time, and a constant current will flow that is proportional to the magnitude of the emf. The current is the charge that flows divided by the time it takes to flow, or T

|emf| = change in flux/T
|I| = |emf|/R = charge/T

Same time on both sides of the equation, so...

ok, i see now how to solve without the time.


For the second, how do you get current to the left? Current is into the page for the moveable bar. The rails are stationary.

ok, so the current (the one created by the battery or whatever, which is shown to go to the left) goes through the bar, therefore going into the page where the bar is? then i get it.

For the last one, think in terms of flux. The bottom is trying to increase the flux downward (field lines getting closer together- field strength increasing), so the induced emf has to produce a flux upward (magnetic field points upward. The top is decreasing the flux downward (field lines getting farther apart- field strength decreasing), so the induced emf has to increase the flux downward.

In terms of North and South, the bottom has to repel the falling magnet and the top has to attract it. The induced field must have "north" below pointing upward and above pointing downward.

ok i get it now, thanks a lot for the help!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top