How to Solve the Equation 1^x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tombow2558
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 1^x equals 1 for all rational x, and for it to be continuous, it holds true for all real x as well. The main question shifted to solving the equation (1 + x)^x = x, which has no solutions. For x < -1, the left side is undefined, and for -1 < x < 0, the left side is positive, making equality impossible. In the range 0 < x < 1, the right side exceeds 1, and for x = 1, the equation results in a false statement. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that the equation (1 + x)^x = x cannot be solved.
Tombow2558
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How can I solve this equation ?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
it is one for all rational x, and hence, if we've any intent on it being continuous it is 1 for all real x, a non-rigorous explanation admittedly but it agrees with the proper exp{xlog1} definition.
 
For people who have not spotted there was an edit in the title that has not shown up on the main board. The question s/he is now asking is how to solve:

(1 + x)^x = x
 
Did Tombow2885 edit to change to question or was mattgrime just responding to the title?

The question I see is to solve (1+x)x= x.

The left hand side is not defined for x< -1. If -1< x< 0, the left hand side is positive and so cannot equal x. The left hand side is not defined for x= 0.
If 0< x< 1, the right hand side is larger than 1 and so cannot equal x. If x= 1, the equation becomes 2= 1 which is clearly not true.

If x> 1 (1+x)x> 1+x and so cannot be equal to x.

You can't solve the equation, it has no solution.
 
matt grime said:
it is one for all rational x, and hence, if we've any intent on it being continuous it is 1 for all real x, a non-rigorous explanation admittedly but it agrees with the proper exp{xlog1} definition.
Oh, I am sorry matt, because the titles still the same even when I edited, I also didn't see your post, okey :wink:, thanks for your answer. :)
 
I responded to the original question which asked what 1^x was for x a positive real number.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
975
Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top