How to tell if Energy is Conserved from the Lagrangian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter penguin46
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Lagrangian
penguin46
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
When attempting to determine if energy is conserved by looking at the Lagrangian for a system, one must differentiate wrt time to determine if the Lagrangian is constant in time. When doing this, does one take a partial time derivative or a total time derivative?
Relevant Equations
Lagrangian, Lagrangian equations of motion, multivariable chain rule
I am fairly certain that the answer here is to differentiate partially with respect to time rather than fully. In Landau and Lifshitz' proof of energy conservation one of the hypotheses is that the partial of L wrt time is zero. Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That’s right, yes. It’s an example of the Beltrami identity, whereby independence of the Lagrangian with respect to the independent variable implies a first integral (in this case the energy).
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
penguin46 said:
Homework Statement:: When attempting to determine if energy is conserved by looking at the Lagrangian for a system, one must differentiate wrt time to determine if the Lagrangian is constant in time. When doing this, does one take a partial time derivative or a total time derivative?
Relevant Equations:: Lagrangian, Lagrangian equations of motion, multivariable chain rule

I am fairly certain that the answer here is to differentiate partially with respect to time rather than fully. In Landau and Lifshitz' proof of energy conservation one of the hypotheses is that the partial of L wrt time is zero. Am I on the right track?
To analyse the Lagrangian itself, we consider it an abstract function of independent variables. If (as an abstract function) it is independent of ##t##, then energy is conserved. That means taking the "partial" derivative.

To perform a "total" derivative, we would have to take the other (no-longer-independent) variables as functions of ##t##. To do that we would have to consider the Lagrangian as a time-dependent quantity that we calculate along a curve, say.

There's an important distinction between the roles of the Lagrangian in these two aspects of Lagrangian mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and vanhees71
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top