B How to understand formula for bending of a rectangular rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating Young's modulus for a rod experiencing bending under forces. It emphasizes that deflection is linear with force, allowing for the use of superposition when deflections are small. The main inquiry is whether to use just the additional force and the change in deflection or to account for both forces and the total deflection. Clarification is sought on whether the forces are applied at the same location, which could impact the calculations. Understanding the relationship between the forces and deflection is crucial for accurate modulus determination.
Lotto
Messages
251
Reaction score
16
TL;DR Summary
If we have a rod shown on the picture below, we can calculate Young's modulus as ##E =\frac{F l^3}{4yab^3}##, where ##a## is a width and ##b## is a height of the rod.

Now my question is: If the rod is already bended with a certain ##y## as on the picture and if we apply an another additional force ##F'## and the total bend would be ##y'##, can we use in the formula to calculate ##E## only ##F'## and ##y'-y##? Or do we have to use ##F+F'## and ##y'##?
The picture:
picture.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that the deflection is linear with force.
Each force causes a proportional deflection.
So long as the deflection is small, the order of application is not critical.
 
Lotto said:
TL;DR Summary: If we have a rod shown on the picture below, we can calculate Young's modulus as ##E =\frac{F l^3}{4yab^3}##, where ##a## is a width and ##b## is a height of the rod.

Now my question is: If the rod is already bended with a certain ##y## as on the picture and if we apply an another additional force ##F'## and the total bend would be ##y'##, can we use in the formula to calculate ##E## only ##F'## and ##y'-y##? Or do we have to use ##F+F'## and ##y'##?

The picture:
View attachment 358226
You can use superposition if the deflections are not too large.
 
You can reson this one out. Suppose that there is not load, i.e. both ##F## and ##F'## are zero. What does the rod look like? Now add ##F## and ##F'##. How would you calculate the height? You may or may not have to ignore the bending of the rod under its weight.
 
Lotto said:
Now my question is: If the rod is already bended with a certain ##y## as on the picture and if we apply an another additional force ##F'## and the total bend would be ##y'##, can we use in the formula to calculate ##E## only ##F'## and ##y'-y##? Or do we have to use ##F+F'## and ##y'##?
Quick question- are F and F' applied at the same location?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top