B How to understand formula for bending of a rectangular rod?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating Young's modulus for a rod experiencing bending under forces. It emphasizes that deflection is linear with force, allowing for the use of superposition when deflections are small. The main inquiry is whether to use just the additional force and the change in deflection or to account for both forces and the total deflection. Clarification is sought on whether the forces are applied at the same location, which could impact the calculations. Understanding the relationship between the forces and deflection is crucial for accurate modulus determination.
Lotto
Messages
253
Reaction score
16
TL;DR
If we have a rod shown on the picture below, we can calculate Young's modulus as ##E =\frac{F l^3}{4yab^3}##, where ##a## is a width and ##b## is a height of the rod.

Now my question is: If the rod is already bended with a certain ##y## as on the picture and if we apply an another additional force ##F'## and the total bend would be ##y'##, can we use in the formula to calculate ##E## only ##F'## and ##y'-y##? Or do we have to use ##F+F'## and ##y'##?
The picture:
picture.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that the deflection is linear with force.
Each force causes a proportional deflection.
So long as the deflection is small, the order of application is not critical.
 
Lotto said:
TL;DR Summary: If we have a rod shown on the picture below, we can calculate Young's modulus as ##E =\frac{F l^3}{4yab^3}##, where ##a## is a width and ##b## is a height of the rod.

Now my question is: If the rod is already bended with a certain ##y## as on the picture and if we apply an another additional force ##F'## and the total bend would be ##y'##, can we use in the formula to calculate ##E## only ##F'## and ##y'-y##? Or do we have to use ##F+F'## and ##y'##?

The picture:
View attachment 358226
You can use superposition if the deflections are not too large.
 
You can reson this one out. Suppose that there is not load, i.e. both ##F## and ##F'## are zero. What does the rod look like? Now add ##F## and ##F'##. How would you calculate the height? You may or may not have to ignore the bending of the rod under its weight.
 
Lotto said:
Now my question is: If the rod is already bended with a certain ##y## as on the picture and if we apply an another additional force ##F'## and the total bend would be ##y'##, can we use in the formula to calculate ##E## only ##F'## and ##y'-y##? Or do we have to use ##F+F'## and ##y'##?
Quick question- are F and F' applied at the same location?
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K