MHB How to Understand the Ratio of Quadratic Roots?

Mathsonfire
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
86
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180712/7faa109f841501a10a2d07b6e8e10681.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mathsonfire said:
86

Those are nice problems. If you're prepping for the Olympiad, you will need the skills. If all else fails, brute force it! Of course, if you're not fast enough, you'll waste too much time.

Personally, I wrote down the ratios and solved for b. You could solve for any of the 4 remaining arbitrary coefficients.

They were nice to you and made them both monic quadratics.
 
tkhunny said:
Those are nice problems. If you're prepping for the Olympiad, you will need the skills. If all else fails, brute force it! Of course, if you're not fast enough, you'll waste too much time.

Personally, I wrote down the ratios and solved for b. You could solve for any of the 4 remaining arbitrary coefficients.

They were nice to you and made them both monic quadratics.

I didnt get it
 
Mathsonfire said:
I didnt get it

Didn't get what? Ratios? Solve for...? Please provide YOUR work.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top