How was the angle sum of polygons derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter prasannapakkiam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Polygon Sum
prasannapakkiam
We all know that for the angle sum of the external angles of a non-concaved polygons is 360. How is/was this derived...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The sum of the interior angles is 180n - 360. Let a set Q denote n angles whose sum is 180n - 360: [ {a_{1}, a_{2} , ... , a_{n} ]. For any of these angles, the external angle is equal to 180 - a_{k}. Since there are n angles, the sum of all external angles is

S = \sum_{k = 1}^{n} 180 - a_{k}

S is obviously equal to 180n - (180n - 360) = 360
 
But... I see it as; the equation you started with was derived from the fact that the sum of exterior angles equalled 360... If not how was your starting equation derived?
 
Take any point inside the polygon. Join it to the vertices, to divide the polygon into n triangles.

The sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 (see any basic geometry textbook for a proof of that).

So the sum of the angles in all the triangles = 180n.

The sum of the angles round the interior point = 360.

So the sum of the interior angles if the polygon = 180n - 360.
 
Brilliant; thanks for that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top