Undergrad How Were Napier’s Logarithms Invented?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Napier's invention of logarithms was rooted in comparing arithmetic and geometric progressions, where he conceptualized a point moving along a segment AB with a velocity inversely proportional to the distance remaining to point B. This led to the realization that the distance to B is infinite, forming the basis of logarithmic calculations. The invention facilitated easier multiplication through the use of logarithmic tables, allowing users to add logarithms instead of multiplying numbers directly. This innovation ultimately contributed to the development of the slide rule, a critical tool for engineers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of arithmetic and geometric progressions
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of calculus concepts related to limits and rates of change
  • Awareness of historical mathematical tools like the slide rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of logarithms through resources like Wikipedia's History of Logarithms
  • Study the derivation and applications of natural logarithms (ln) in various mathematical contexts
  • Investigate the practical uses of logarithmic tables in historical calculations
  • Learn about the design and functionality of the slide rule and its relevance in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, engineering students, and anyone interested in the historical development and applications of logarithmic functions.

DLeuPel
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
I’m trying to figure out how logarithms we’re invented. In addition, what does the calculator do when I want to solve a logarithm. After researching I found out that you could compare an arithmetic progression with a geometrical one, obtaining the principal properties of exponent calculation. Later, I found that Napier imagined a segment AB, where there was a point Q traveling along the segment but it’s velocity decreased proportionally in relation to the distance left to reach B. This would be a geometric progression. Then, you would divide the segment for each second that passed. After that, you would stretch the divided parts so they are equal. So due to the fact that the velocity decreases in relation to the distance left to B, it never reaches B. Therefore, the distance to B is infinite since for each second, the point travels the same distance. This would be an arithmetical progression.

Until there I can sort of understand it, but the difficult part for me comes here:

—————- The point
img-0002.png
moves at a constant speed of 107, so we have
img-0004.png
Since P moves at a speed that is proportional to the distance
img-0006.png
left to travel we have
img-0007.png
From this we see that

img-0008.png

which gives

img-0009.png

for some constant
img-0010.png


We can work out the value of c using our initial conditions. At the start, the point P still needs to travel the whole length of the line segment AB, which is 107. Therefore
img-0013.png
. The point Q hasn’t gone anywhere yet, so
img-0014.png


Plugging this into the expression above gives

img-0015.png

so

img-0016.png

Therefore,

img-0017.png

so

img-0018.png

and
img-0001.png
————-

All of the calculations on the top are copied from https://plus.maths.org/content/calculating-napiers-logarithm

Now, if we are trying to solve or to figure out how were logarithms invented and imagined, how does the ln appear if that itself is a logarithm. Also, could someone complete the explication of the foundation of logarithms ?
 

Attachments

  • img-0002.png
    img-0002.png
    227 bytes · Views: 509
  • img-0004.png
    img-0004.png
    477 bytes · Views: 569
  • img-0006.png
    img-0006.png
    162 bytes · Views: 544
  • img-0007.png
    img-0007.png
    404 bytes · Views: 512
  • img-0008.png
    img-0008.png
    544 bytes · Views: 561
  • img-0009.png
    img-0009.png
    439 bytes · Views: 554
  • img-0010.png
    img-0010.png
    164 bytes · Views: 484
  • img-0013.png
    img-0013.png
    318 bytes · Views: 561
  • img-0014.png
    img-0014.png
    280 bytes · Views: 590
  • img-0015.png
    img-0015.png
    406 bytes · Views: 522
  • img-0016.png
    img-0016.png
    379 bytes · Views: 521
  • img-0017.png
    img-0017.png
    299 bytes · Views: 531
  • img-0018.png
    img-0018.png
    515 bytes · Views: 527
  • img-0001.png
    img-0001.png
    539 bytes · Views: 553
Physics news on Phys.org
DLeuPel said:
Now, if we are trying to solve or to figure out how were logarithms invented and imagined, how does the ln appear if that itself is a logarithm. Also, could someone complete the explication of the foundation of logarithms ?
Well, multiplication used to be hard and addition easy (by comparison). Therefore, the invention of logarithms meant that you could look up the factors in a table, add them, and then look up the answer in (another) table.

And - it laid the groundwork for the invention of the "slide rule", the essential part of any engineer's tool set.
 
Svein said:
Well, multiplication used to be hard and addition easy (by comparison). Therefore, the invention of logarithms meant that you could look up the factors in a table, add them, and then look up the answer in (another) table.

And - it laid the groundwork for the invention of the "slide rule", the essential part of any engineer's tool set.
I was thinking more of a mathematical approach for an explanation, but thank you.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K