How would a long object move?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edward Solomo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the movement of a hypothetical unbreakable rod measuring 11.8 million miles, questioning how force applied at one end would affect the opposite end. It is established that no object can move faster than the speed of light, meaning the motion would propagate as a longitudinal wave, akin to a sound wave. The molecular composition of the rod significantly influences the speed of this motion, with different materials exhibiting varying behaviors. The conversation also touches on the theoretical limits of sound speed, which cannot exceed the speed of light due to electromagnetic interactions. Ultimately, the idea of an inflexible rod is deemed non-existent in practical terms, as real materials will always transmit force through mechanical waves.
Edward Solomo
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
How would a "long" object move?

My question is seemingly simple.

Let us suppose that we had an unbreakable/inflexible rod whose length was 11.8 million miles in length (one light-minute). Now assume that we applied enough force at one end of the rod to move the entire rod altogether. As nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, how long would it take for the opposite end of the rod to move? Does the motion of the rod become a wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


An inflexible rod wouldn't move because it doesn't exist. But yes, a real rod begins to move by pasing the force through the rod in the form of a longitudinal wave: a sound wave.
 


Sure. Let's say this rode is made from a chunk of a neutron star. Well, if this is the case, it will still take more than a second (several hours i guess) before the other end moves. But for a hypothetical stiff, rigid rode I think it can never be at rest neither can it be accelerated. This means at any given time both ends are moving at the same speed irrespective of any gravitavion fields. Think ether. NOTE: This is my own speculation. It should not be taken as fact. Thanks.
 


russ_watters said:
An inflexible rod wouldn't move because it doesn't exist. But yes, a real rod begins to move by passing the force through the rod in the form of a longitudinal wave: a sound wave.

This suggests that the molecular composition would affect the "speed of motion" of a rod.

After doing a little reading (now since I know what to read), I saw some sources calling it "mechanical information" that travels in sound waves, as the guy said above. Is there any theoretical limit on the speed of sound?
 


Edward Solomo said:
This suggests that the molecular composition would affect the "speed of motion" of a rod.
Yes, a rubber rod beheves differently than a steel rod, when rotated.

Edward Solomo said:
After doing a little reading (now since I know what to read), I saw some sources calling it "mechanical information" that travels in sound waves, as the guy said above. Is there any theoretical limit on the speed of sound?
Yes, the speed of light in vacuum. The electromagnetic interactions between the atoms of the rod, cannot go faster than that.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top