B How Would an Extra Planet Behind the Sun Affect Earth's Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
An extra planet hiding behind the Sun would have a minimal gravitational effect on Earth, significantly less than the Sun's influence. Its tidal impact would be negligible due to the distance and size constraints, making extreme tidal changes or global quakes unlikely. The planet would need to maintain a precise orbit to remain hidden, as any deviation would lead to it becoming visible due to gravitational interactions with other celestial bodies. Discussions about doomsday scenarios related to such a planet are considered pseudoscience and are not permitted in serious scientific discourse. Overall, the presence of a hidden planet would not lead to the dramatic effects initially proposed.
jayzun
The reason I made an account is to ask about the effect of gravity from an extra planet hiding behnd the sun. I think that if this was the case we would see much great impacts¿ say like the tides. Would they not be extremely high and low? Nonstop quakes that would be felt across the world? I asked this in a thread. Was advised to make a sperate thread.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jayzun said:
The reason I made an account is to ask about the effect of gravity from an extra planet hiding behnd the sun. I think that if this was the case we would see much great impacts¿ say like the tides. Would they not be extremely high and low? Nonstop quakes that would be felt across the world? I asked this in a thread. Was advised to make a sperate thread.
The impact of a planet on the opposite side of our orbit would depend on its size, but would have to be pretty small; much smaller than the sun's impact on things like the tides, of course (since it would have to be much smaller and further away than the sun).
 
jayzun said:
The reason I made an account is to ask about the effect of gravity from an extra planet hiding behnd the sun. I think that if this was the case we would see much great impacts¿ say like the tides. Would they not be extremely high and low? Nonstop quakes that would be felt across the world? I asked this in a thread. Was advised to make a sperate thread.
Tidal forces fall off by the cube of the distance. A planet hiding on the Other side of the Sun could not be much more massive than the Earth and would need to orbit at the same distance as the Earth. Since the Earth is ~1/333,000 as massive as the Sun, and the planet would be twice as far away as the Sun, its tidal effect on the Earth would be 1/8*1/333,000 = 1/2664000 that of the Sun.
It would be much easier to detect by its gravitational perturbing the orbits of the other planets. However, this is a two edged sword. They would also perturb its orbit. This is a problem because a planet orbiting on the exact opposite side of the Sun from the Earth is in a special type of orbit. It will only remain there if it stays exactly there. If it drifts the least bit out of position with respect to the Earth, gravitational forces will act to pull it even further out of position. It's like a needle balanced on its point; the slightest nudge and it topples over. Since such a planet could not help but be nudged out of position by the pull of other planets, it would soon drift into an orbit that would make it visible from the Earth.
 
Right. So if a rouge planet was to be on a path for us there would be NO way for any government to hide. The planet x doomsday people are out in left field,but entertaing.
 
jayzun said:
Right. So if a rouge planet was to be on a path for us there would be NO way for any government to hide. The planet x doomsday people are out in left field,but entertaing.
You were asked to start a new thread to discuss gravitational effects, not pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. That is not allowed at the PF. Thread is closed.

(BTW, rouge = red)
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top