How would I count the zeros of zsin(z)-1 in a complex disc?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on counting the zeros of the function f(z) = z sin(z) - 1 within the complex disc defined by {z: |z| < (n + 1/2)π}. The user initially attempts to apply Rouche's theorem using the functions f(z) and g(z) = -R² sin(pz)/z but realizes that this approach is flawed due to the differing number of roots. The correct approach involves using g(z) = z sin(z), which accounts for a double zero at z = 0, thus allowing for a valid application of Rouche's theorem to demonstrate the number of zeros within the disc.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, particularly Rouche's theorem.
  • Familiarity with the properties of the sine function in complex variables.
  • Knowledge of the behavior of zeros of functions in complex discs.
  • Experience with plotting complex functions for visualization (e.g., using WolframAlpha).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Rouche's theorem in complex analysis.
  • Explore the properties of the sine function in the complex plane.
  • Investigate the behavior of zeros of functions within complex discs.
  • Learn how to visualize complex functions using tools like WolframAlpha.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of complex functions and their zeros.

Phillips101
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The disc in question is {z: |z|<(n+1/2)pi}. I can't figure out how to apply Rouche to this. Any help would be appreciated.

(This is in the context of showing all roots of zsin(z)=1 are real. I counted the zeros of zsin(z)-1 on the real axis and got 2n+2, and now I hope to get the same answer via the disc...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does this work:

f(z) = z sin(z) - 1

g(z) = -R^2 sin(pz)/z

where R is the radius of the disc and p some carefully chosen number very close to 1 and you try to show that:

|f(z) - g(z)| < |f(z)| on the boundary of the disk?
 
Last edited:
At first glance, your g(z) has an odd number of roots within the disc, whereas f(z) would have an even number (I'm fairly sure of this, since f(z)+1 is even and the first peak's height is greater than 1 - look at a plot of it on wolframalpha or something if you're not convinced). So, I don't think your function can work.

What was your thinking behind selecting it? What exactly did you mean by 'carefully chosen p'?
 
Yes, it seems that this doesn't work. I'll take a look later at this again.
 
f(z) = z sin(z) - 1

g(z) = z sin(z)

should work if you take into account that g(z) has a double zero at z = 0 that f doesn't have.
 
Ah! I forgot about that double zero. Very much appreciated
 
So how can we apply Rouche to this? Which pair of functions do we choose?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K