MHB How would you do this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon T
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 1.05 = (1 + i)^6 is discussed in terms of solving for the variable i, presumed to represent an interest rate. Participants clarify that only the positive real root is relevant for practical applications. To find all six roots, one suggested rewriting the equation and factoring it as a difference of cubes. The focus remains on determining the roots effectively while considering the context of the variable. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical approach to solving the power equation.
Simon T
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1.05 = (1 + i)^6
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Assuming $i$ is a variable, and not the imaginary unit, are you interested in all 6 roots, or just the reals, or just the positive reals?
 
im not too sure what you mean. Here's a screenshot of the question:

2z8qekn.png
 
Well, what does $i$ represent...an interest rate? If so, then we are only interested in the positive real root.
 
it just says solve the power equation
 
Okay, well to get all 6 roots, I would let:

$$r=\sqrt[3]{\frac{21}{20}}$$

And write the equation as:

$$\left((1+i)^2\right)^3-r^3=0$$

Now, factor this as a difference of cubes...what do you get?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top