Hunter's images stir Bigfoot debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter B. Elliott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images
AI Thread Summary
A hunter's camera in Ridgway, Pennsylvania, captured an image of a mysterious creature, sparking debate about its identity. Some participants in the discussion suggest it resembles a bear suffering from mange, while others argue it looks more like a chimpanzee, possibly an escaped illegal pet. The debate highlights the difficulty in identifying the creature due to the angle of the photo and the lack of a clear view of its head. Comparisons are made to images of mangy bears, which some believe closely match the creature's appearance. Others humorously speculate about the possibility of it being a new species or a costume. The conversation also touches on the broader topic of Bigfoot sightings, with some participants referencing the myth and its cultural significance, while others express skepticism about the existence of such creatures. Overall, the discussion reflects a mix of curiosity, humor, and skepticism regarding the creature's true nature.
B. Elliott
Messages
263
Reaction score
10
RIDGWAY, Pa. - It's furry and walks on all fours. Beyond that, about the only thing certain about the critter photographed by a hunter's camera is that some people have gotten the notion it could be a Sasquatch, or bigfoot. Others say it's just a bear with a bad skin infection.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071028/ap_on_fe_st/odd_bigfoot_in_pa
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Even though I've always been a little skeptical of the Bigfoot reports, that doesn't look like any kind of bear I've ever seen.
 
That picture is astonishing because it looks exactly like a chimp, which shouldn't be roaming around loose in the US. I imagine someone's illegal pet escaped.
 
My thoughts exactly. It's a chimp, not a bear. That's the very first thing that came to mind when I opened the linked image.
 
zoobyshoe said:
That picture is astonishing because it looks exactly like a chimp, which shouldn't be roaming around loose in the US. I imagine someone's illegal pet escaped.

Possible. Though, I've also never seen a bear without a full coat of fur to know what a mangy one might look like if a lot of that fur were missing, especially if it were on the thin side due to long-term illness. Hard to tell when you can't see the head.

Ah, here's a picture of a bear with mange...yep, matches the photo in the story.
http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/PICKOVER/pc/nakedbear.html

(Keep it away from me! I don't want to be a mangy moonbear! :biggrin:)
 
Last edited:
it looks like a bear throwing up ----(the pads of the hind feet look like a bear's)
 
Moonbear said:
Possible. Though, I've also never seen a bear without a full coat of fur to know what a mangy one might look like if a lot of that fur were missing, especially if it were on the thin side due to long-term illness. Hard to tell when you can't see the head.

Ah, here's a picture of a bear with mange...yep, matches the photo in the story.
http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/PICKOVER/pc/nakedbear.html

(Keep it away from me! I don't want to be a mangy moonbear! :biggrin:)

That does look a lot like whatever is in the hunters picture. The only thing that keep standing out to me, is the length of the legs relative to the body.
 
Moonbear said:
Ah, here's a picture of a bear with mange...yep, matches the photo in the story.
http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/PICKOVER/pc/nakedbear.html
Yeah, that picture puts "mangy bear" squarely in the running. I didn't realize their back legs were that long.

There's something about the way the limbs are bending in the hunter's pic that still says "chimp", though.
 
zoobyshoe said:
There's something about the way the limbs are bending in the hunter's pic that still says "chimp", though.
I see what you're talking about, but think it's just the angle of the photo giving that illusion.
 
  • #10
Moonbear said:
I see what you're talking about, but think it's just the angle of the photo giving that illusion.

Absolutely possible. Odds are way in favor of a bear, too. Still, chimps happen.
 
  • #11
At first glance I thought it looked more like a chimp. After taking a closer look the front leg and head posture looks more like a bear. The coat isn't easy to see but the rear appears to have more hair than I would expect on a chimp. Not that I've had a chance to view many chimps from that angle.
 
  • #12
well --its got four legs, a back, and a seat (a butt area)--a new species?--a chear?

(a cross between a chimp and bear)
 
  • #13
There's a bigfoot research organisation?
 
  • #14
There were other bears in the group. So if it's a chimp, then we have an interesting group, don't we?

*waits for pic of lion cub, meerkat and warthog joining group*
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Mallignamius said:
There were other bears in the group. So if it's a chimp, then we have an interesting group, don't we?

*waits for pic of lion cub, meerkat and warthog joining group*

Been spending a bit of time in the Disney thread, huh? :biggrin:
 
  • #16
I would never in a zillion years have conceded that it was a bear - until I saw Moonbear's photo.

Man that bear is nightmarish! I had no idea they looked like that under the fur.
 
  • #17
DaveC426913 said:
I would never in a zillion years have conceded that it was a bear - until I saw Moonbear's photo.

Man that bear is nightmarish! I had no idea they looked like that under the fur.

That's the last time I'll send you nude photos of me. :-p
 
  • #18
Hm. Gives a new meaning to the name Moonbear.:biggrin::smile:
 
  • #19
Wow I didn't realize the bigfoot actually was a myth I just thought it was a fun movie to watch when I was a kid! Always wanted to meet a bigfoot!
They should've taken a clear photo, to me it looks like a prehistoric relative of homosapiens maybe it's an australopithecus anamensis... Or someone dressed up in an awsome halloween costume... hmmm
 
  • #20
rhuthwaite said:
Wow I didn't realize the bigfoot actually was a myth I just thought it was a fun movie to watch when I was a kid! Always wanted to meet a bigfoot!
They should've taken a clear photo, to me it looks like a prehistoric relative of homosapiens maybe it's an australopithecus anamensis... Or someone dressed up in an awsome halloween costume... hmmm
Sightings of upright walking hairy critters go way back. Follow the link in my signature and read about Dr. Baddour and the Zoobies.
 
  • #21
rhuthwaite said:
They should've taken a clear photo,

Sasquatches will only pose for grainy photos in dim lighting, otherwise you'd know they were just mangy bears looking for fame and fortune by posing as a Sasquatch. :biggrin:
 
  • #22
"I think Bigfoot is blurry. That's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault: Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra-scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside."
- Mitch Hedberg
 
  • #23
morphism said:
"I think Bigfoot is blurry. That's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault: Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra-scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside."
- Mitch Hedberg

He suffers from a merely half-collapsed wave function. It'll never completely collapse till someone gets a good look at him, but they can't get a good look at him cause he's roaming around half-collapsed and too blurry to get a good look at.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
23K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top