Hydrogen-Oxygen Rocket Engines

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kunzite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engines Rocket
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of hydrogen-oxygen rocket engines, specifically addressing the combustion process and how it generates thrust. Participants explore the chemical reactions involved, the physical principles at play, and the implications for rocket propulsion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jacques describes an experiment involving hydrogen and oxygen, questioning how an implosion can lead to propulsion in rocket engines.
  • Integral clarifies that the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen produces water, and the energy released propels rockets, emphasizing that the exhaust is water vapor, not CO2.
  • Jacques acknowledges the clarification but differentiates between hydrogen-oxygen reactions and traditional black powder propulsion methods.
  • Another participant explains that water condenses in the experiment due to the cooling effect of the test tube and mercury, despite the energy released during combustion.
  • A participant introduces the ideal gas law to analyze the reaction, noting that while the number of gas molecules decreases, the temperature increases significantly, affecting pressure and expansion dynamics.
  • One participant mentions the energy released during bonding in chemical reactions, contributing to the understanding of combustion energy.
  • Jacques expresses curiosity about the implications of energy dissipation in propulsion, suggesting a hypothetical scenario involving capacitors and radiation pushing an object backward.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic principles of combustion and energy release in hydrogen-oxygen reactions, but there are differing views on the implications and interpretations of these processes, particularly regarding the nature of propulsion and the comparison to other propulsion methods.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the ideal gas behavior and the specifics of energy transfer during combustion remain unresolved. The discussion also reflects varying levels of scientific understanding among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in rocket propulsion, chemical reactions, and the principles of energy transfer in physical systems may find this discussion informative.

Kunzite
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi !
I remember an experiment in school where two volumes of Hydrogen and one of Oxygen were mixed in a test tube set upside down on (at the time !) a platter full of mercury.
A spark in two electrodes on top of the tube would trigger an IMPLOSION and the mercury would jump upward to fill the volume. Miracle: in a residual space probably due to the imperfection of the ratio of the mixture, small droplets of WATER were visible!
My question concerns Hydrogen/Oxygen rocket engines. I never got a satisfying answer to this question:
I understand that the usual mixtures of propulsion create an instantaneous violent & important expanding volume of mainly CO2 being expelled on the back of a rocket and create a reaction thus a propulsion.
But how something that I understood apparently wrongly as a reduction / IMPLOSION can push a rocket ??
Thanks
Cordially
Jacques D. Paris France
Thx to your old folks for coming o:)
 
Science news on Phys.org
2 parts Hydrogen combusted with 1 part Oxygen forms water. H_2 O remember? The water left in the tube was the PRODUCT of the combustion of the gases. Why did the Mercury fill the tube? Because the volume occupied by the water was less then that occupied by the original gases.

The combustion of O and H releases a LOT of energy, it is this energy which propels the space shuttle. The white plume of exhaust gases is WATER vapor, not CO_2
 
Thanks for your answer Integral. In:
I understand that the usual mixtures of propulsion
I was referring to most others ie:Black Powder generating expulsed gases.
Bye and thanks again.
 
For the experiment in the OP, the water condenses (as Integral said) because even though the reaction produces a lot of energy for the material consumed, it isn't a lot compared to the heat capacity of the test tube and mercury, so the water vapor quickly cools and condenses.
 
Let's look at this in more detail using the ideal gas law.

The chemical reaction is 2H2 + O2 = 2 H20.

The pressure of an ideal gas is given in many places, for instance
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/idegas.html

PV = nRT, or if we count in molecules, rather than moles, PV = NkT

For our example, it's convenient to count in molecules, N, rather than moles, n, so the correct formula is PV = NkT.

Now, when the above reaction occurs, N goes down - N is intially 3, and goes down to 2.

But T goes up - way up. T starts at 300K at room temperature, and increases to about 3000K (per http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1998/JamesDanyluk.shtml )

If we hold the volume constant, we can ask what happens to the pressure. P = NkT/V, where V is a constant. So P is proportional to the product of N T. The decrease in N by a factor of 2/3 is more than made up by the 10x increase in T.

I would predict that high speed photos would show the mixture initally expanding (pushing the mercury down, before it cooled off and contracted).
 
when 2 things bond the energy used to create the bond is released =]
 
I would predict that high speed photos would show the mixture initally expanding (pushing the mercury down, before it cooled off and contracted).
Thanks pervect and everyone.
This talks to my down to ground way of understanding things, :wink: . ( I do not have a formal scientific education or diploma just curious of everyhing)
I was of course aware that energy is pushing the rocket It cannot be denied :approve:
Over time, it is usually the only answer I got but it did not feed my curiosity. I would grumble using my sparse (or spare) neurones something like...
"""So, if one would violently dissipate a tremendous amount of Joules from enormous capacitors in a suppositely as big gas discharge flash device thus generating an intense radiation of this energy light in the reflector's direction would this crazy lampost be pushed violently backward"""
Cordially
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K