Hydrostatic Pressure Curved Surface

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hydrostatic force acting on a curved submerged surface, exploring the mathematical derivation of the pressure forces involved. Participants consider various geometries and the implications of hydrostatic pressure on different surface shapes, including both 2-D and 3-D surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Josh initiates the discussion by seeking a derivation of hydrostatic force for various curved surfaces, expressing a desire to engage in the mathematical process.
  • Chet outlines the hydrostatic equation, stating that pressure increases with depth and acts normal to the surface, leading to the formulation of pressure force on a differential area.
  • Participants discuss the formulation of pressure as an integral over the submerged area, with Chet providing a correction to the force equation and suggesting a specific geometry for analysis.
  • There is a proposal to consider a surface parallel to the y-axis, with a width and a function defining the surface shape, prompting questions about the unit normal vector.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the unit normal and tangent vectors, with a focus on deriving the resultant force vector acting on the surface.
  • Participants explore the integration of the force components, discussing the implications of the center of mass in the context of the pressure force calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of hydrostatic pressure and the need for integration to determine the resultant forces. However, there are varying interpretations regarding the specific formulations and geometries, and the discussion remains unresolved on certain mathematical details and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the geometry of the surface and the definitions of the unit normal and tangent vectors, which may affect the outcomes of the calculations. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly regarding the integration process and the application of the center of mass concept.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals interested in fluid mechanics, particularly those looking to understand the application of hydrostatic principles to curved surfaces and the mathematical derivation of forces in fluid contexts.

member 428835
Hi PF!

I have been reading and reading for a clean explanation for the hydrostatic force of a curved submerged 2-D (or 3-D if you're up to it) surface. I really don't care what the curve looks like: quadratic, circular, partway sinusoidal, etc. All articles I read involve the centroid, but could someone help me through a derivation where we do all the math ourself? If so you choose the geometry (or I can) and let's start into it!

Thanks either way!

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure increases with depth according to the hydrostatic equation, correct? The pressure acts on every surface in the direction normal to that surface, correct? So the pressure force on a differential area dA is ##p\vec{n}dA##, where ##\vec{n}## is a unit normal to the surface. You need to add up (integrate) all these pressure forces vectorially.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
Chestermiller said:
The pressure increases with depth according to the hydrostatic equation, correct?
Chet
Correct. So the pressure at any submerged point is ##p = \rho g d## where ##p## is pressure, ##\rho## is density, ##g## is acceleration of gravity, and ##d## is the vertical distance submerged?

Chestermiller said:
The pressure acts on every surface in the direction normal to that surface, correct? So the pressure force on a differential area dA is ##p\vec{n}dA##, where ##\vec{n}## is a unit normal to the surface. You need to add up (integrate) all these pressure forces vectorially.

So pressure is then $$\vec{p} = \iint_A \rho g d \cdot \vec{n} dA$$ (I used the ##\cdot## so my depth variable doesn't look like a differential, not to mistake it with a dot product).
 
joshmccraney said:
Correct. So the pressure at any submerged point is ##p = \rho g d## where ##p## is pressure, ##\rho## is density, ##g## is acceleration of gravity, and ##d## is the vertical distance submerged?
So pressure is then $$\vec{p} = \iint_A \rho g d \cdot \vec{n} dA$$ (I used the ##\cdot## so my depth variable doesn't look like a differential, not to mistake it with a dot product).
Correction to your equation:
$$\vec{F} = \int_A \rho g z \vec{n} dA$$
OK. Let's take a simple example. Let the area of interest be parallel to the y axis, and have a width w. Let the equation for the surface be x = x(z). Then ##dA=w\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dz)^2}##. What is the equation for the unit normal to the contour?
 
Chestermiller said:
Correction to your equation:
$$\vec{F} = \int_A \rho g z \vec{n} dA$$
Of course, not sure why I didn't put a force.

Chestermiller said:
OK. Let's take a simple example. Let the area of interest be parallel to the y axis, and have a width w. Let the equation for the surface be x = x(z). Then ##dA=w\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dz)^2}##. What is the equation for the unit normal to the contour?
I think ##\vec{n} = - \hat{j}##. I can't really picture the surface you describe though. Is it something like a cylinder in the ##y## direction with an arbitrary cross section that is a function of ##x## and ##z##?
 
joshmccraney said:
Of course, not sure why I didn't put a force.I think ##\vec{n} = - \hat{j}##. I can't really picture the surface you describe though. Is it something like a cylinder in the ##y## direction with an arbitrary cross section that is a function of ##x## and ##z##?
At every value of y, x is the same function of z. On the surface of interest, y runs from 0 to W.

The unit normal to the surface is not j. The unit tangent to the surface is ##\vec{t}=\frac{(dx)\vec{i}+(dz)\vec{k}}{\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dz)^2}}##. The unit normal to the surface is then $$\vec{n}=\frac{(dz)\vec{i}-(dx)\vec{k}}{\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dz)^2}}$$

So, if we call p(z) is the pressure at depth z, what is the resultant force vector acting on the surface, according to our integral?
 
Ohhhhhh I think I see the shape you're describing now, and you're talking about the sides? Is the force then $$\vec{F} = \int_0^W \int_{z_0}^{z_1} \rho g z \left( \hat{i} - x'(z) \hat{k} \right) \, dz dw$$
 
joshmccraney said:
Ohhhhhh I think I see the shape you're describing now, and you're talking about the sides? Is the force then $$\vec{F} = \int_0^W \int_{z_0}^{z_1} \rho g z \left( \hat{i} - x'(z) \hat{k} \right) \, dz dw$$
Very nice. Now the w can be integrated immediately, and the x component of the force can be obtained as an exact differential. The z component should be partially handled using integration by parts. Check out the x component carefully. You should be able to see some kind of center of mass thing from this. BTW, if you are integrating from z0 to z1, you need to include the pressure a z0 in the pressure expression at depth z.

Chet
 
$$\vec{F} = \int_0^W \int_{z_0}^{z_1} \rho g z \left( \hat{i} - x'(z) \hat{k} \right) \, dz dw =\\ W g \rho \hat{i}\int_{z_0}^{z_1} z \, dz - W g \rho \hat{k}\int_{z_0}^{z_1}\rho z x'(z) \, dz =\\ W g \rho \hat{i}\int_{z_0}^{z_1} z \, dz - W g \rho \hat{k} \left( z_1 x(z_1)-z_0 x(z_0) - \int_{z_0}^{z_1}x \, dz\right)$$
where I believe the ##z \, dz## integral can be rewritten as a center of mass. You agree with this?
 
  • #10
joshmccraney said:
$$\vec{F} = \int_0^W \int_{z_0}^{z_1} \rho g z \left( \hat{i} - x'(z) \hat{k} \right) \, dz dw =\\ W g \rho \hat{i}\int_{z_0}^{z_1} z \, dz - W g \rho \hat{k}\int_{z_0}^{z_1}\rho z x'(z) \, dz =\\ W g \rho \hat{i}\int_{z_0}^{z_1} z \, dz - W g \rho \hat{k} \left( z_1 x(z_1)-z_0 x(z_0) - \int_{z_0}^{z_1}x \, dz\right)$$
where I believe the ##z \, dz## integral can be rewritten as a center of mass. You agree with this?
Yes. It's going to be ##\Delta z## times the pressure at the center of mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K