MHB Hypotheses Testing: Sample Size <10 & Known Population Mean/Std Dev

  • Thread starter Thread starter kieranf144
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
AI Thread Summary
When conducting hypothesis testing with a sample size of less than 10 and known population mean and standard deviation, the standard error should be calculated using the sample variance. Despite knowing the population parameters, sampling may still be necessary to assess differences due to treatment variations. A one-sample T test is appropriate, using the population mean as the benchmark for comparison. The null hypothesis can be stated as H0: μs = μ0, where μs is the sample mean and μ0 is the population mean. This approach allows for evaluating the significance of the observed differences.
kieranf144
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm working on something where the sample size is less than 10 and I know the population mean and standard deviation. When using the T test most of the examples I find calculate the standard error from the sample standard deviation but these are cases where the population standard deviation is unknown. Should I be using the population or sample standard deviation to calculate the standard error?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi kieranf144,

Welcome to MHB! :)

I'm curious, if you already know the population mean and variance then why are you sampling? In any case, the standard error is calculated using the sample variance.
 
Thanks. I have a sample that has been treated differently to the population and I'm trying to see if the difference is significant. Do you think that sounds correct?
 
I would try a one sample T test and use the population mean as the benchmark.

In this case the population mean $\mu_0$ and the hypothesised mean from your sample as $\mu_s$ and

$H_0: \mu_s = \mu_0$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top