Hypothesis testing with normal distribution

Cheman
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
Hypothesis testing with normal distribution...

I've been learning about Hypothesis testing with normal distribution, but I don't understand the need for the significance level. By this I mean that i understand that according to the Central Limit Theorem a distribution of the means will be a normal distribution (for a sufficiently large value of n ) with a mean of the mean of the initial population and a standard deviation equal to the standard deviation of the population divided by the square root of n. However, to see whether we think a sample no longer fits the original popultion (as is the aim of hypothesis testing) I would have initially guessed that you would see if the mean of the sample being tested was an outlier - ie: its mean was 2 standard deviations out of the "mean distribution". However, this is apparently not the case - we instead use a significance level, and this should apparently tell us the boundary for whether the teasted sample is still relevant to the parent population or not - even if this significance level is above or below 2 sds of the mean; its is this significance level that matters not whether the mean of the tested sample is an outlier. Why is this the case?

Thanks in advance. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With hypothesis testing you can determine what the actual probability of making an error is. Saying "reject the hypothesis if the sample statistic is 2 st. dev. away from it" is just an arbitrary rule-of-thumb.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top