Hypothetical situation of planck length object and lightspeed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of a hypothetical object measured at Planck length being accelerated to near light speed. It establishes that while length contraction is a well-known phenomenon in relativity, it lacks absolute physical meaning, particularly for objects at quantum scales. The Penrose-Terrell effect modifies classical relativistic length appearance, indicating that objects viewed transversely do not contract. Additionally, the conversation highlights the challenges of defining length at quantum scales, where measuring rods lose significance and only wave-function locations remain relevant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck length and its significance in physics
  • Familiarity with special relativity and length contraction concepts
  • Knowledge of the Penrose-Terrell effect and its implications
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics and wave-functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Penrose-Terrell effect in relativistic physics
  • Explore the relationship between quantum mechanics and classical measurements
  • Study the concept of spacetime mesh and its effects on particle behavior
  • Investigate the role of wave-functions in defining properties of sub-atomic particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and relativity, particularly in understanding length contraction and its implications at quantum scales.

Curtis15
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Initially known theories:

1. General consensus: Planck length is smallest measurable unit of length

2. Objects approacing light speed contract in length

Scenario: Some hypothetical mass measured to be a Planck length is accelerated infinitely close to light speed.

Questions: Can a length contraction be detected? Does the length contraction actually occur?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The problem gets a little stickier than that if the universe is divided up into a spacetime mesh at plank distance.

A light beam or particle moving at some angle to the mesh must do the old computer graphics jaggie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaggies) because you have a grid.

Try get your head around conservation of energy and momentum around that ... or is that why we have Quantum mechanics to take it off grid for the jumps :-).
 
1. There is no absolute length contraction. The idea has no physical meaning. There is the appearance of length change to an external observer with a relatively different velocity.

2. Classical relativistic length-appearance change was modified with the introduction of Penrose and/or Terrell effect/rotation (1959).

3. Due to the Penrose-Terrell effect, objects observed transversely to the objects' directions do not contract in appearance. Scientific American made this error a few years ago when they showed colliding heavy ions as shortened into oblate spheroids.

4. We are presumably talking about spherical geometry concerning sub-atomic particles.

5. At quantum scales well above Planck lengths anyway, it's hard to think about length distortion for objects that only have a defined wave-function.

6. At quantum scales, measuring rods lose their meaning. They have meaning only for the classical macroscopic (trains, spaceships, etc.) relativistic textbook discussions. Where are the 'end points' of 'measuring rods' when the end-points have only wave-function 'locations' in space? However, clock-metrics are retained as far as (relative!) time-dilation is concerned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K