Hysteresis: Magnetism Lags Behind Current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains that hysteresis occurs in magnetic systems where the magnetic flux density lags behind the magnetizing current. When the current increases, the magnetic flux also rises but does so with a delay, while a decrease in current results in a stronger-than-expected magnetic flux due to the time it takes for the flux to respond. The capitalized portion emphasizes that changes in magnetic flux are time-dependent and always lag behind current changes. The hysteresis curve illustrates this relationship, showing that for a given current, the magnetic field strength is higher when the current is decreasing. Overall, the conversation clarifies misconceptions about hysteresis and its implications in magnetism.
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain the following lines? [Only the bit where the letters are capitalized]
"The flux density versus the magnetization of the specimen for the various values of the magnetizing current of the solenoid is plotted by a CRO...from the figure, we can conclude that value for flux density for any value of current is always greater when current is decreasing than when it's increasing, I.E. MAGNETISM LAGS BEHIND THE MAGNETIZING CURRENT. This phenomenon is known as hysteresis."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hysteresis exists in systems in which effects lag causative mechanisms, so there is not a reliable way to predict the instantaneous state of the system without having an understanding of the history of the system. When the magnetizing current is increasing, the magnetic flux is also increasing, but lagging the increase in current. When the magnetizing current is decreasing, the magnetic flux also reduces, but is stronger than one might expect (calculating from instantaneous values) because of the time it takes for the flux to moderate as the magnetizing current is removed. The capitalized portion of your post explains that the magnitude of the magnetic flux in the system rises and falls with the magnitude of the magnetizing current BUT these changes in flux take time to occur and always lag behind the changes in current.
 
Here in thumbnail is a page extracted from Wikipedia on hysteresis. The horizontal axis is the current in amps (amp turns per meter) and the vertical axis is field strength (Tesla). When a hysteresis curve data is neasured, the measurement points go around the loop in a counterclockwise direction. For a given number of amps, the field is higher (lagging) when the direction of the current is decreasing.
 

Attachments

  • Hysteresis1.jpg
    Hysteresis1.jpg
    88.8 KB · Views: 502
Thanks for the efforts, the answers you guys posted have cleared my misconceptions about hysteresis :-)
 
And I think there's a typo in my post [the 1st line of the text I quoted] : "The flux density versus the magnetization CURRENT of the ..."
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top