I am off by one decimal and I cannot see the error in my work

  • Thread starter Thread starter pemby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Work
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 3K views
pemby
Here is a screenshot of the question I deleted on stack physics after they directed me to this forum.
Screen Shot 2017-10-25 at 10.48.42 AM.png
Eratta:
FYI I have tried with g = -9.80 and 58.9 m when the correct solution (I think) is 5.9 rounded two significant figures. Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-10-25 at 10.48.42 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-25 at 10.48.42 AM.png
    31.8 KB · Views: 966
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you used -(-9.8) for g in the height formula. The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=vot+a/2 t2, and a= - 9.8 now. Also, the second term on the right side should be vtan(30°).
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
I think you used -(-9.8) for g in the height formula. The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=vot+a/2 t2, and a= - 9.8 now. Also, the second term on the right side should be vtan(30°).
I agree with your g assessment, but think you should reconsider that advice about the tan 30 degrees vs sin 30 degrees.
 
Chestermiller said:
I agree with your g assessment, but think you should reconsider that advice about the tan 30 degrees vs sin 30 degrees.
You are right, it is tangent in the formula y(x).
 
pemby said:
Hi, I am attempting to derive a solution based on equations on the 1st page of this document.
http://themcclungs.net/physics/download/H/2_D_Motion/Projectile Cliff.pdf
The text you refer to would use +9.8 m/s2 for the acceleration due to gravity.
" The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=volt+a/2 t2"
In the spirit of understanding where formulas come from could you derive that from the equations I am using to derive my solution?

I[/QUOTE]
Your solution is wrong. for g, you have to use the positive value, g=9.8 m/s2.
 
Hi all...

Tangent = sin/cos = sin*1/cos that is just rewriting the expression. It does not change the value.

[tex]{ y }_{ f }\quad =\quad -\frac { 1 }{ 2 } g{ \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } }^{ 2 }+\left( v\sin { \left( \theta \right) } \right) \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } \quad +\quad { y }_{ 1 }\quad =-\frac { 1 }{ 2 } g{ \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } }^{ 2 }+\frac { v }{ v } \frac { \sin { \left( \theta \right) } }{ \left( \cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } x+y1\quad =-\frac { 1 }{ 2 } g{ \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } }^{ 2 }+\tan { \left( \theta \right) } x+y1[/tex]

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1/2(-9.81)*(x/(v*cos(30)))^2+v*sin(30)*x/(v*cos(30))+y1=0,+x=16.5,+v=6+solve+for+y1

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1/2(-9.81)*(x/(v*cos(30)))^2+sin(30)/(cos(30))*x+y1=0,+x=16.5,+v=6+solve+for+y1

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1/2(-9.81)*(x/(v*cos(30)))^2+tan(30)*x+y1=0,+x=16.5,+v=6+solve+for+y1
 
pemby said:
Hi, I am attempting to derive a solution based on equations on the 1st page of this document.
http://themcclungs.net/physics/download/H/2_D_Motion/Projectile Cliff.pdf
"The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=volt+a/2 t2"

In the spirit of understanding where formulas come from, could you derive that from the equations I am using to derive my solution?
If you start with the assumption that acceleration ##a_y## is constant, you can derive the equation ##\Delta y = v_{0_y} \Delta t + \frac 12 a_y \Delta t^2##. In the case of free fall, following the usual sign conventions, you have ##a_y = -g## where the minus sign denotes the direction of the acceleration and ##g=+9.80~\rm{m/s^2}## is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity.