I am off by one decimal and I cannot see the error in my work

  • Thread starter Thread starter pemby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to projectile motion and the application of kinematic equations. Participants are examining the use of gravitational acceleration and its sign in the context of uniformly accelerated motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive solutions based on provided equations and questioning the correct application of gravitational acceleration. There are discussions about the use of tangent versus sine in calculations and the derivation of displacement formulas.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights regarding the use of gravitational acceleration, with some suggesting a reconsideration of the trigonometric functions involved. The conversation reflects a mix of agreement and differing viewpoints on the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are references to external documents for deriving equations, and participants are exploring the implications of sign conventions in their calculations. The original poster has indicated a potential error in their work related to significant figures and the values used for gravitational acceleration.

pemby
Here is a screenshot of the question I deleted on stack physics after they directed me to this forum.
Screen Shot 2017-10-25 at 10.48.42 AM.png
Eratta:
FYI I have tried with g = -9.80 and 58.9 m when the correct solution (I think) is 5.9 rounded two significant figures. Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-10-25 at 10.48.42 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-25 at 10.48.42 AM.png
    31.8 KB · Views: 948
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you used -(-9.8) for g in the height formula. The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=vot+a/2 t2, and a= - 9.8 now. Also, the second term on the right side should be vtan(30°).
 
Last edited:
Hi, I am attempting to derive a solution based on equations on the 1st page of this document.
http://themcclungs.net/physics/download/H/2_D_Motion/Projectile Cliff.pdf

" The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=vot+a/2 t2"
In the spirit of understanding where formulas come from could you derive that from the equations I am using to derive my solution?

I
 
ehild said:
I think you used -(-9.8) for g in the height formula. The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=vot+a/2 t2, and a= - 9.8 now. Also, the second term on the right side should be vtan(30°).
I agree with your g assessment, but think you should reconsider that advice about the tan 30 degrees vs sin 30 degrees.
 
Chestermiller said:
I agree with your g assessment, but think you should reconsider that advice about the tan 30 degrees vs sin 30 degrees.
You are right, it is tangent in the formula y(x).
 
pemby said:
Hi, I am attempting to derive a solution based on equations on the 1st page of this document.
http://themcclungs.net/physics/download/H/2_D_Motion/Projectile Cliff.pdf
The text you refer to would use +9.8 m/s2 for the acceleration due to gravity.
" The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=volt+a/2 t2"
In the spirit of understanding where formulas come from could you derive that from the equations I am using to derive my solution?

I[/QUOTE]
Your solution is wrong. for g, you have to use the positive value, g=9.8 m/s2.
 
Hi all...

Tangent = sin/cos = sin*1/cos that is just rewriting the expression. It does not change the value.

[tex]{ y }_{ f }\quad =\quad -\frac { 1 }{ 2 } g{ \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } }^{ 2 }+\left( v\sin { \left( \theta \right) } \right) \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } \quad +\quad { y }_{ 1 }\quad =-\frac { 1 }{ 2 } g{ \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } }^{ 2 }+\frac { v }{ v } \frac { \sin { \left( \theta \right) } }{ \left( \cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } x+y1\quad =-\frac { 1 }{ 2 } g{ \frac { x }{ \left( v\cos { \left( \theta \right) } \right) } }^{ 2 }+\tan { \left( \theta \right) } x+y1[/tex]

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1/2(-9.81)*(x/(v*cos(30)))^2+v*sin(30)*x/(v*cos(30))+y1=0,+x=16.5,+v=6+solve+for+y1

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1/2(-9.81)*(x/(v*cos(30)))^2+sin(30)/(cos(30))*x+y1=0,+x=16.5,+v=6+solve+for+y1

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1/2(-9.81)*(x/(v*cos(30)))^2+tan(30)*x+y1=0,+x=16.5,+v=6+solve+for+y1
 
pemby said:
Hi, I am attempting to derive a solution based on equations on the 1st page of this document.
http://themcclungs.net/physics/download/H/2_D_Motion/Projectile Cliff.pdf
"The formula for the displacement in case of uniformly accelerating motion is y=volt+a/2 t2"

In the spirit of understanding where formulas come from, could you derive that from the equations I am using to derive my solution?
If you start with the assumption that acceleration ##a_y## is constant, you can derive the equation ##\Delta y = v_{0_y} \Delta t + \frac 12 a_y \Delta t^2##. In the case of free fall, following the usual sign conventions, you have ##a_y = -g## where the minus sign denotes the direction of the acceleration and ##g=+9.80~\rm{m/s^2}## is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K