I am stuck on evaluating the limit of a rational function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of a rational function as x approaches 2. The original poster presents a limit expression involving a rational function and expresses confusion regarding the limit's value.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate the limit by graphing and algebraic manipulation, including rationalizing the denominator. Some participants question the classification of the function as a rational function and discuss the implications of irrational numbers in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the nature of the function and the limit's evaluation. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the limit's value, with some asserting that the limit is not zero, while others are exploring the definitions and properties of rational functions.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a graph that suggests a limit value, but participants note discrepancies regarding the behavior of the function at x=2, particularly concerning the denominator's role in the limit evaluation.

Charismaztex
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate the limit: [tex]lim_{(x)\rightarrow(2)}\frac{x^2+x-6}{sqrt(x+4)-sqrt(6)}[/tex]

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I've drawn the graph which indicates that the at x=2, y=0, so 0 would seem to be the limit.
I could not, however, get the limit expression by algebraic manipulation to get to 0.

First of all, I rationalized the denominator to give x-2, which is a common factor of the numerator and the denominator. But canceling this, I am left with the expression:

[tex]lim_{(x)\rightarrow(2)}((x+3)(sqrt(x+4)+sqrt(6))[/tex]

after the [tex]lim_{(x)\rightarrow(2)}\frac{x-2}{x-2}[/tex] comes to 1.

I may have missed something crucial, so I just can't get the limit to be 0

Any help is greatly appreciated,
Charismaztex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try again - the limit is not zero. Your simplification is correct.
 
That is NOT, by the way, a rational function.
 
@statdad The graph shows that at x=2, y=0. How is this explained?

@ HallsofIvy Why not? I thought it can be expressed in the form p/q where p and q are real. Or if there are irrational numbers anywhere, does this make it void?
 
A rational function is a ratio of polynomials.
 
Charismaztex said:
@statdad The graph shows that at x=2, y=0. How is this explained?

Check your graph again. the one I've attached doesn't show that: in fact, there is no point on the graph at x = 2 because of the denominator.
@ HallsofIvy Why not? I thought it can be expressed in the form p/q where p and q are real. Or if there are irrational numbers anywhere, does this make it void?

A rational number is a ratio p/q where both numerator and denominator are integers. A rational expression is a fraction in which both numerator and denominator are polynomials.
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K