I can do most of the problem in Goldsten/Poole

  • Thread starter Thread starter tronter
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Studying classical mechanics independently, especially without formal coursework, raises the question of whether to revisit foundational texts like Halliday/Resnick. While proficiency in problem-solving with Goldstein indicates a certain level of understanding, it is essential to recognize that Goldstein assumes prior knowledge of classical mechanics concepts typically covered in undergraduate courses. For those seeking a deeper conceptual grasp of mechanics, revisiting undergraduate texts is advisable. Taylor's book is recommended for its clarity and effectiveness in bridging the gap between basic and advanced concepts.
tronter
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
I am studying classical mechanics by myself (math major). Should I go back to books like Halliday/Resnick also? Or if I can do most of the problems in Goldstein, then is this not required? I have never taken a physics course in university (just wanted to study classical mechanics).

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what your aim is. Goldstein says, flat out, if you don't have the conceptual understanding you won't get it from that book. At that point it is assumed you have had Classical Mechanics as a freshman, senior/junior, and now as a graduate student. So, if you want to know how to DO mechanics then keep chugging away... If you're after a deeper understanding of the underlying meaning then hit the undergrad texts, then Goldstein. I would recommend Taylor, he does a good job. Have fun!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
398
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top