I confronted something in math which is way too confusing to me

  • Thread starter Thread starter sankalpmittal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing
sankalpmittal
Messages
785
Reaction score
27
I confronted "something" in math which is way too confusing to me !

Hello forums ,
I am currently in class 10th , and 15 years... I was doing Khan Academy Pre-calculus yesterday and I confronted something too weird ... not weird though but way too confusing...
:cry:

Here is the link :
http://www.khanacademy.org/video/more-limits?playlist=Precalculus

Now what I am confused with , is that , Sal ( That's not a name of a tree !) says that

lim (x-2|x|)/|x|
x→0

Then he says that when limit x tends to 0 from positive side then :

lim (x-2|x|)/|x|
x→0+

is SAME AS

lim (x-2x)/x
x→0+

which is equal to

lim (x-2|x|)/|x| = -1
x→0+

This makes sense to me and here comes which confuses me :

Now Sal says that when x approaches 0 from negative side then :

lim (x-2|x|)/|x|
x→0-

is SAME AS

lim (x-2(-x))/-x
x→0-

which is equal to

lim (3x)/-x
x→0-

SO

lim (x-2|x|)/|x| = -3
x→0-

This does not make sense ! |-x| → |x| right ?
Why he wrote |-x| = -x ?! OR |x| = -x ? ! where x < 0 ?!

Can someone explain it to me , please ?:frown:

Thanks in advance ...:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


|x| is the absolute value of x, so you "ignore the minus sign". For positive number, an example would be say, |5|=5. So you can see that |x|=x if x > 0. For negative x, say -3, its absolute value is |-3|=3, yes? But 3=-(-3), so |x|= -x if x < 0.
 


As Yenchin says you can't work with |x| directly and so you break the problem up into two cases:
- one equation where x is positive so that you can replace |x| with x
- one equation where x is negative so that you can replace |x| with -x

these replacements come from the definition of the absolute value function:
- for x>0 the value is x
- for x=0 the value is 0
- for x<0 then value is -x

and since x=0 can't be used due to division by zero being an undefined operation.
 


yenchin said:
|x| is the absolute value of x, so you "ignore the minus sign". For positive number, an example would be say, |5|=5. So you can see that |x|=x if x > 0. For negative x, say -3, its absolute value is |-3|=3, yes? But 3=-(-3), so |x|= -x if x < 0.

jedishrfu said:
As Yenchin says you can't work with |x| directly and so you break the problem up into two cases:
- one equation where x is positive so that you can replace |x| with x
- one equation where x is negative so that you can replace |x| with -x

these replacements come from the definition of the absolute value function:
- for x>0 the value is x
- for x=0 the value is 0
- for x<0 then value is -x

and since x=0 can't be used due to division by zero being an undefined operation.

Thanks yenchin and jedishrfu !
Now I know why Sal wrote |x| = -x , where x<0 !
You two mean that here x < 0 and so x is negative.
So -x will here be positive i.e. -x>0 or x<0
As we know that "absolute function || " yields positive value , so |x| = -x where x<0
AND
|x| = x , where x>0
AND
|-x| = x , where x>0
AND
|-x| = -x , where x<0 , in number form I write it like -: x=-1
|-(-1)| = |1| = 1 which is same as -x right ?
Is this what you two mean right ?

Now I can move forward in pre-calculus.

Thanks a lot ! :smile:
 


sankalpmittal said:
Thanks yenchin and jedishrfu !
Now I know why Sal wrote |x| = -x , where x<0 !
You two mean that here x < 0 and so x is negative.
So -x will here be positive i.e. -x>0 or x<0
As we know that "absolute function || " yields positive value , so |x| = -x where x<0
AND
|x| = x , where x>0
AND
|-x| = x , where x>0
AND
|-x| = -x , where x<0 , in number form I write it like -: x=-1
|-(-1)| = |1| = 1 which is same as -x right ?
Is this what you two mean right ?

Now I can move forward in pre-calculus.

Thanks a lot ! :smile:
What you have above is sort of the definition of the absolute value. In a briefer form, it is:
|x| = x, if x >= 0
|x| = -x, if x < 0
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top