I discovered m-theory, and I(Serious.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter livingdigits
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    M-theory
AI Thread Summary
A 35-year-old individual has been developing a theory related to m-theory for two years but is now facing challenges due to personal circumstances, including the recent discovery of fatherhood. They express concern about the potential for others to discover their work, despite feeling that their insights are unique. The individual lacks a strong mathematical background, having only recently acquired basic calculus skills, and is seeking mentorship and support to further develop their theory. They emphasize the need for a credible mentor who can provide guidance and resources, ideally in the Chicago area, while also expressing the desire to maintain authorship of their work. The discussion also includes suggestions for sharing their theory in a more formal setting, such as an independent research forum, where it could be evaluated according to established guidelines. The conversation highlights the challenges of gaining recognition and support in the scientific community for independent research.
livingdigits
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I’m 35 years old. About two years ago I discovered m-theory, and have been developing it ever since, as time permits. I recently learned that I have a daughter, and I am now forced to mostly-abandon the work, at least for well into the foreseeable future. However, the theory itself has important real-world applications which would greatly benefit us all, and the planet, if it were brought sooner, rather than later. Also, there is the possibility that someone else could discover it, although I’m not so sure since they haven’t already. (It was not hard for me to discover it, which makes me think there is no one on the task who is sufficiently gifted.)

Work has been slow because I do not have the necessary mathematical (or scientific) background. I have had to do a lot of reading, on just about every major scientific field. This gave me a very general view of nature which allowed me to extend and clarify the theory, but I am now at the point where rigor is needed. I started with no mathematical background. I now have basic calculus and pre-calculus, and will likely have vector calculus and differential equations within the next 60 days (which will finally give me the tools to actually understand some things!). Unfortunately, beyond that, I simply don’t see any opportunity to continue working toward a finished product that is suitable for public consumption.

I need a person with credentials and resources to provide some support. I am not looking to scam anyone. I will show this person enough of what I have to convince them that I am the real deal. I will show them m-theory. If they are not convinced, they can simply hang up the telephone and tell their friends about the crazy person they just spoke to. I also expect them to see that it was no fluke which allowed me to discover the theory, but that I am instead a serious and talented thinker who is capable of fully materializing the project. Specifically, I need mentoring and a place to live while I am being mentored, even if it is only a bedroom. The Chicago area would be best, but I am very flexible. I have considered approaching universities about this. However, I require a custom curriculum, lodging, and one-on-one instruction. I understand they usually bend over backwards for athletes. Maybe I could find a university to work with. I don’t know.

Also, I realize that by giving away my insights I am providing someone else with the ability to finish the theory on their own. Supposing this person opts to do so, we must be clear of two things: I am the discoverer, and it will be my work which is published. If my benefactor chooses to develop the theory themselves, ahead of me, it will basically be for their private satisfaction. They are not to publish or communicate the work in any way. History will see that I have been at this problem since I was a child, and it was a lifetime of hard-earned insights which gradually led me to the solution. You do not want to go down as the biggest thief in human history. I will also record every conversation of ours so that we can be clear about these things from the beginning. I will use the same recorder which I use to make notes. At any rate, I expect you to be in good standing among your peers.

Send me a message. Tell me what you do, what you know, and what you can provide. I realize that I am unlikely to find help this way. However, I don’t know where else to go (I'm the solitary type) and I am starting to worry that all my insights were for naught.

Serious suggestions are also welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry you're not the first one with such a "theory". Nobody is going to believe you for several reasons that I won't mention. Why don't you go to the point and expose your "theory", like any physicist would do?
The thread can then be moved into the "Independent Research" if it qualifies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fluidistic said:
Don't worry you're not the first one with such a "theory". Nobody is going to believe you for several reasons that I won't mention. Why don't you go to the point and expose your "theory", like any physicist would do?
The thread can then be moved into the "Independent Research" if it qualifies.

Typically people read a message before responding to it. Thanks for trying.
 
fluidistic said:
Why don't you go to the point and expose your "theory", like any physicist would do?
The thread can then be moved into the "Independent Research" if it qualifies.

No, first go to our Independent Research forum and read the guidelines there.

https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=146

If you can meet those guidelines, then feel free to post your theory there. That's the only place on PF where we discuss theories or work that has not already been published in a professional venue (usually a peer-reviewed journal, sometimes arxiv.org).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
210
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top