# I feel bad I can't understand the most simple of algebra

1. May 31, 2009

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
First, let me tell you a bit about myself. I did not do well in geometry and math in middle school, I was terrible at it. At high school, something changed and I took Algebra I. I was getting B's to high A's. I got awarded the rotary club award for student of the month, because of my grades at the time. I had alot of problems in school with learning problems, so I decided to graduate from a charter school. I graduated and have been taking a long break, many years, I'd say at least 4 or 5 persuing other interests. I recently started some training in basic computer skills such as excel, powerpoint and word and am starting my internship this monday, 10 weeks, 2 hours a day, 2 days a week. After that I plan to get a job with basic clerical computer work, and study and go to college on the side with a pale grant. I have always enjoyed math immensly, and I got the book "calculus for dummies" and read it from cover to cover. The main thing was I could not do most of it like basic limits because I never learned how to factor.

I also skipped geometry and trigonmetry, as I just wanted to read out of pleasure. I enjoy reading about mathematics and solving problems. Recently when I was at computer school I picked up a GED book on factoring, hoping to finally learn it. I reviewed some algebra I hadn't done for years, and managed to get the factoring questions right. Needless to say I was happy with that. The main thing, I found out, was to find the greatest common factor of the terms and put that on the outside of the formula, then ask myself that number times "what" equals the outcome.

I do want to take some schooling in mathematics and perhaps engineering after I get really good. But I find myself not understand even the basic problems. I have a very good book (at least I think so) on algebra, it is called "Algebra, The easy way" and is presented in a story, which I find easier to learn on the most part, because it explains WHY things happen the way they do. However, I'm stuck on the first chapter! Here's the problem:

Verify the associative properties of addition and multiplication in the following cases. To do this, calculate the result of the expression in two different ways. (It does not say how)
For example,

3 x (4 x 5)= 3 x 20 = 60
(3 x 4) x 5= 12 x 5 = 60

2. Relevant equations
Problem 1:
12 x 6 x 2

Problem 2:
11 x 5 x 16

Part 3:
In excerises 20-31, write formulas that perform the indicated functions. (In each case you will need to think of the appropriate letters to represent the quantities indicated)
20. Calculate your pay if you work h hours in one week and are paid $5 per hour. 3. The attempt at a solution For the first 2 problems, I'm really at a lost here. I learned how to factor polynomials with algebra, but I can't figure out this! It must be really simple. If someone could please give me a tip or hint or how to solve them, it would be greatly appreciated! On part 3, I used to be good at word problems, I guess I can try to solve this one! Let h equal the number of hours worked in one week. Then,$5/per hour x 7h

Is this correct?

Thanks for helping me out, or giving me hints! I love this book and want to try and get back into math.

2. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

First, try and choose a category that "most closely fits" your question. In this case, you might chose Topic - Homework & Coursework Questions> Precalculus Mathematics.

For problems (1) and (2), in words, what is the associative property of multiplication? If you don't understand your book's definition, it is fine to look this up on the web. Use a search engine of your choice, and try some key words like: "associative property", math.
Then come back here and let us know what you learned.

For (3), what is the result you are trying to determine by your equation? (assign that a variable name). What other pieces of information have they given you?
Let us know what you've come up with and we can point you in a successful direction.

Last edited: May 31, 2009
3. May 31, 2009

### HallsofIvy

Staff Emeritus
Just follow the pattern shown in the first example.
Calculate (12 x 6) x 2 and 12 x (6 x 2). What do you get?

Where did the 7 come from?

4. May 31, 2009

The associative property of multiplication means it doesn't matter where you put the parentheses, the product will be the same.

I don't understand how to rearrange the number like it does in the example

I think I am over thinking it.

As regards to the algebra problem, I guess I need a refresher on word problems. I used 7 because of 7 days in a week.
Note: There seems to be more than one answer for each problem I and 2, with the assosiciative property of multiplication:
Problem 1:
12 x 6 x 2
(12 x 6) x 2 = 144
(2 x 12 ) x 6 = 144

Problem 2:
11 x 5 x 16
(11 x 5) x 16 = 880
(11 x 16) x 5 = 880

Is this right?

PS: I also wanted to apologize for not posting this in the right section, I tried my best.

5. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

You are correct in describing the associative property (for multiplication)
and also its application to questions (1) and (2)
and there are more than two answers.

In addition to those you've found, you could have
For (1)
12 x (6 x 2) = 12 x 12 = 144
For (2)
11 x (5 x 16) = 11 x 80 = 880

I'll give you a hint on (3); what you want to determine is your "pay". You might assign that a variable name.
Now, in words, what do you need to do, to calculate your pay? (your description should not include any numbers or variable names)

Last edited: May 31, 2009
6. May 31, 2009

Let p = pay, then p = 5 x h

Here's another one:
21. Calculate your pay if you work more than 40 hours and are paid time and one half for every hour past 40.

7. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

I was teaching you a strategy for solving these kinds of questions. Before moving on, lets try and understand what happened in part(3)#20. Once you understand the strategy I am sharing, you will be better able to field questions like #21, on your own.

What were the other pieces of information given to calculate the "pay"?

Since you got stuck there, I'll give you a couple more hints.
You were given a variable of "time" (hours) and a "rate" (in units per time) In this case your rate was in dollars per hour. They could have given you a rate in British Pounds per year.

They also ask you to assign a variable to these terms. Often the first letter is a good choice (unless there are more than one term with the same first letter). Lets call "pay" P, and "rate" r, and "time" t.

You now have all the pieces you need to calculate pay. Can you tell me in words, how you to determine "pay"?

8. May 31, 2009

pay = rate * time

pay = rt

Is this right?

9. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

Good Job!!

Okay in #21, lets approach in a similar fashion.
What is the result you wish to find? (Assign that a variable name).
What other pieces of information do they give you?

Last edited: May 31, 2009
10. May 31, 2009

21. Calculate your pay if you work more than 40 hours and are paid time and one half for every hour past 40.

p = pay

t = time

t * 1/2

11. May 31, 2009

### Staff: Mentor

t * 1/2 represents only half the time. Try it with some specific numbers first to get a feel for the kind of calculation you need to do.

If you are paid $10/hr and you work 50 hours in a week, what would be your gross pay? 12. May 31, 2009 ### BadFish$10/per hour * 50 = \$500 gross pay

13. May 31, 2009

### symbolipoint

BadFish, tell us more about the book you are using, Algebra the Easy Way. How does it compare or constrast to a normal introductory textbook on Algebra 1? You could study from a good traditional book on your own over maybe 3 to 5 months. You might then, if you believe you learned well enough, enroll in an Intermediate Algebra course at a community college (or you could study this too, on your own). You would not really need to buy a new book from a retail bookstore, especially if you have a local source of used books. Even books 20 to 35 years old can be excellent.

As far as the number properties ("field axioms") and factoring either plain numbers or expressions, this is well covered in the first few chapters of traditional beginner Algebra books.

14. May 31, 2009

It is an algebra book that explains in a medievil story how algebra works and why. It has traditional axions and properties that a normal book has, only in a story format.

15. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

Okay, but you are also given a condition of pay, when your work is > 40hrs.
In this practise example, how many hours did you work over 40hrs?
With that amount hours (over 40hrs) , how much would you earn?

16. May 31, 2009

I really just don't understand this, the word problems.

I really have no idea...how to determine over 40 hours. I think I would need to go to a class with a teacher who can help me rather than self learn.

I'm going to go read the book again and try to understand it more. I really want to learn this well as I enjoy math and I don't mind the challenge, not going to give up on this.

Last edited: May 31, 2009
17. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

I am sorry, I wasn't clear in my last post.
In this practice example, where your total hours worked is 50.
How many hours did you work over 40hrs?

Do you know what time and a half means? (hint: on google search engine, try some key words like "time and a half" . Be sure to use quotation marks if you are search for a specific phrase)? Once you have found that, please let us know here.

18. May 31, 2009

Here's another example of it. I just feel awful because I used to be very good at understanding algebra, in class with a teacher but learning it by myself again is very hard for me.

Since multiplication is just a short cut to addition, I assume the rules are the same for multiplication

Rules for adding odd and even numbers:
If you add together two even numbers, the result is an even number
If you add together two odd numbers, the result is an even number
If you add together one even number and one odd number, the result is an odd number

Here's what's confusing me:
"Next, we developed our first result that we proved, rather than assumed. (a proved result is called a theorem.) We set out to prove the addition properties for odd and even numbers. We realized that any even number could be written in the form 2 x n, where n is some natural number. (I think a natural number times a natural number always equals a natural number. if you divide or subtract a natural number it doesn't)

An odd number can be written in the form 2 x n + 1
We tried adding together one even number called 2 x n and another even number called 2 x m, calling the result sum s

s = (2 x m) + (2 x n)
Using the distributive property,
s= 2 x ( m + n)

From the closure property, m + n must be a natural number, so s can be written in the form s = 2 x (some natural number)
Therefore, s must be even
Next, we tried adding together two odd numbers, called 2 x m + 1 and 2 x n + 1 (again calling the result s)
s= (2 x m + 1) + (2 x n + 1)
s = 2 x m + 2 x n + 2
s = 2 x (m + n + 1)

Since m + n + 1 must be a natural number, it follows that s must be even. We had one more combination to do: the sum of an odd number (which we called 2 x m +1 ) and an even number (which we called 2 x n):
s = (2 x n ) + (2 x m + 1 )
s = 2 x (m + n) + 1

Since 2 x (m + n ) must be even, it follows that 2 x (m + n) + 1 must be odd.
"We did it!" The professor exclaimed in amazement. "We can prove general behavior rules by using symbols to stand for letters! I wasn't even sure that could be done!"

---------------

That's an intercept from the book. I wish this would make more sense to me...like it used to.

19. May 31, 2009

Hi Quabache, thank you for your help and patience! It surely is appreciated. A few thing about myself. I have always had learning problems...I have a form of autism called aspergers. I remember in pre-algebra having a problem with a square or rectangle, there was an unknown space. You would simply subtract one side from another to get the unknown space. I did not understand this for a long time and it drove me crazy, once I found out how simple it was I understood it and once I "get it" I got it down. Equations are just trying to make each side balanced, I think. By removing something from one side of the equation, you must add it to the other side to make it balanced, which cancels it out. (for example, +5 - 5 = 0)

The first question is easy, 50-40, 10 hours over 40

Hmm, time and a half. Isn't that halve of the total time? i.e let's say total time is 10 minutes. a = 10. Halve would be 10*1/2 = 5 or 10/2 = 5 or a * 1/2 = 5 and so on.

20. May 31, 2009

### Ouabache

Very interesting.. Don't worry right now if you don't understand all of this. It will make more and more sense as you go on. Looking through that discussion, I am seeing things that I learned to apply in discrete mathematics in college. I am sure it was right there in my middle school algebra text, it just was never emphasized in my course.

Great job!! We will need that number to solve this practice example that Mark44 gave you.

That's not quite right. But you did try and explain what you think it means.
So the next step is to find out what "time and a half" does mean.

Are you familiar with using search engines on the net? They are free services where you can put in some information you wish to search on, and it will return possible sites with applicable information. One that I have used is called http://www.google.com" [Broken] .. There is an open box on their page where you can enter information. In this case we want to choose some key words that can assist in learning what time and a half means. I suggest typing "time and a half" with quotations marks, and then either select the search button with your cursor or just depress the "enter" key on your keyboard. It should return some useful sites. Read through the first few and see how they define "time and a half".
(Why am i spending time teaching how to use search engines?
It is probably the most useful tool that I use on the net. It is a good idea to learn how to use it properly. It can save you lots of time, when learning concepts like this).

Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017