CrysPhys
Education Advisor
2024 Award
- 1,781
- 1,609
^^^Yes.^^^ And some job posts may be for positions that don't actually exist. In expectation of funding for a new project, we would often publish posts in advance to gather resumes, and sometimes even interview promising candidates in advance, so we'd be ready to roll once the funding came through. But if the funding didn't come through ... oh, well, never mind. And then there were the bizarre cases in which an opening did exist, and an existing employee had already been selected to fill it, but HR forced us to post it anyways to satisfy anti-discrimination or diversity (or whatever you call it these days) regulations. Just one of the many reasons why it's so important to develop personal networks (and I don't mean shotgunning people on LinkedIn).Locrian said:Some of it also may depend on how many positions actually turn up in your search area. If there are only a handful of open positions that turn up in a season, well, research away! Why not invest the time? Then I get what Dr. Courtney was saying.
On the other end of the spectrum, I don't know how one actually sends out 100 resumes a day for any real length of time. Are there 3,000 positions in your field you can apply to in a month?
I think most folks are in the middle, where they can and probably should send out a few resumes a day. For me, that calls for some middle ground between shotgunning the same resume everywhere and (at the other extreme) spending inordinate time tailoring your resume for a company that may not even acknowledge you sent it.
Last edited: