I forgot what the formula for this is.

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
To rotate a function f(x) about the x-axis by an angle phi, the new function can be derived using a rotation matrix, although this typically applies to points rather than functions directly. When rotating a function, especially by 90 degrees, it may no longer qualify as a function due to the loss of the vertical line test. The discussion references Euler's formula, but clarifies that it is applicable only to complex numbers, not directly to real-valued functions. The transformation results in a 3-dimensional representation, requiring consideration of fx(x), fy(x), and fz(x). Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of applying rotation to functions compared to points in space.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1
If I give you a function f(x) (cartesian) and I ask you to rotate it about the x-axis (counterclockwise) by an angle phi, what is the new function formula?

I remember I did this with matrices, but I can't remember the one for functions. For convenience, let angle phi be 0, pi/2, 3pi/2, and 2pi.

I am guessing 0 would remain the same. I just don't know how to use matrices on functions.

Does anyone understand my question?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There's obviously SO(n) but that's matrices.

Doesn't Euler's formula do that same thing?

e^{i\theta} = cos\theta + isin\theta

EDIT: Euler's formula is only for complex numbers.
 
Yes, but for functions. Is there no equivalence? I kinda had something like this for conics
 
Kevin_Axion said:
There's obviously SO(n) but that's matrices.

Doesn't Euler's formula do that same thing?

e^{i\theta} = cos\theta + isin\theta

EDIT: Euler's formula is only for complex numbers.

No real numbers please
 
Hhhmmm...if you have a set of points, I can see being rotated with a transformation matrix...but a function? If you have a function f(x) and you "rotate" it 90 degrees...chances are it will stop being a function!...at least, in the sense of the new fnew(x) = trans(forig(x))
 
Back
Top