Undergrad I found 2 formulas about surface tension -- which one is correct?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on two formulas for calculating surface tension, specifically for a solid disk and a thin ring. The formula for the disk is given as γ_disk = W/C, while for the ring it is γ_ring = W/2C, highlighting the difference in interface lengths. The reasoning behind this difference is explained through the analogy of surface tension as a distribution of tiny parallel springs, where the ring has a longer interface, necessitating a lower spring constant to support the same weight. The choice of formula depends on the specific scenario being analyzed. Understanding these derivations is crucial for applying the correct formula in practical situations.
samy4408
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
1666779837352.png

1666779865756.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide the context or references of how these formulas were derived?
 
kuruman said:
Can you provide the context or references of how these formulas were derived?
I found the first one by typing surface tension formula on google , and the second :
1666789001608.png
 
Which you use depends on what question you wish to answer. Say you have a solid disk and a very thin ring both of circumference ##C## and weight ##W## floating in a fluid. In the case of the disk, ##\gamma_{\text{disk}}=\dfrac{W}{C}##; in the case of the ring, ##\gamma_{\text{ring}}=\dfrac{W}{2C}.##

You can imagine the surface tension force as the resultant of a uniform distribution of tiny parallel springs around the length of the interface of the object and the fluid with ##\gamma## playing the role of the spring constant. The ring has twice as long an interface (on the inside and outside) as the disk and therefore twice as many springs. Thus, half the spring constant is required to support the same weight.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K