I heard that someone can go blind from masterbaitng too much

  • Thread starter Thread starter decibel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the myth that excessive masturbation can lead to blindness, with participants largely dismissing this notion as an old wives' tale. They also touch on various other myths related to health, such as getting colds from going outside with wet hair and reading in the dark. The conversation humorously explores the topic of masturbation, with some participants sharing personal anecdotes and opinions about its prevalence among genders. There is a light-hearted debate about whether excessive masturbation can lead to desensitization or interfere with sexual relationships, while others suggest that it may have positive effects, like enhancing sexual performance. The thread evolves into a comedic exchange about conducting scientific experiments on the effects of masturbation, with playful banter and jokes about the topic. Overall, the consensus is that masturbation does not cause blindness or serious health issues, and the discussion highlights the cultural stigma surrounding the subject.
  • #61
i bet if it did make you blind, half the people in this forum wouldent be here would they?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Originally posted by Gale17
i was reading about fantasies the other day, and came across an interesting fact. People who fantasize often, and have vivid detailed fantasies are usually more intelligent than those who don't. Kinda makes you wonder about the kind of things einstein thought about... or all them other genius'... hmm... guess i must be a genius too then :wink:

And since I'm not sure where else in pf i could say this...
"if you don't believe in oral sex... shut yo mouth!"

*raises his hand*

I believe, I believe!
 
  • #63
...bunch of w*nkers (NOT winkers!) lol. man you guys have been busy since last night, mustnt have been any time to experiment if you are all typing posts on here...

Thinking of a female experiment huh?

Well we could get a willing female to masturbate, and i suppose to make it a fair test, male scientists should study seeing as they are the only ones to admit to the act! Anyway the subject shoud continue while the male observers should hold up eye charts and see if there is any degradation of eyesight over a period...say a couple of hours... lol

Any volunteers? (not so fast Gale!)

ps. I am heading the science team for this experiment.
:wink:
 
  • #64
Originally posted by jimmy p
.Any volunteers? (not so fast Gale!)

Dude, you know there are laws. You could be put in jail for requesting that type of stuff from a minor.

Shame on you.

rick1138, good advice. Maybe I should start visiting B&N more often and act like an employee.
 
  • #65
Hey Hey Hey, I am a minor too...if depending on the age of a minor (18 or 21?) Besides it wasnt a request for her! (not so fast Gale!)..as in dont
 
  • #66
well, not so fast in the United States means: "don't try to escape." Therefore I thought you implied she couldn't escape from volunteering.

Also in the US, a minor is anyone under 18 for sex. Under 21 your a minor for alcohol.

[edit] Just saw this picture and thought It was a good representation of men versus women:

Here is the new link:

http://umsis.miami.edu/~dduardo/post-48-1067187458.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #67
ah the old communication problem again...yes looking back at that it was kinda badly worded wasnt it?

ps. can't access that pic, says i don't permission or something? do you have to be registered to neowin or something?
 
Last edited:
  • #68
I seem to remember that there was a study that linked blood pressure problems to improper breathing during masturbation. Many people hold their breath during the act and don't realize they are doing it.

So remember girls, during the experiment, keep breathing. And guys, after observing the female experiment, don't forget to breathe.
 
  • #69
Originally posted by Adrian Baker
Wasn't it Woody Allen who described masturbation as "sex with someone you love"?
I thought he was talking about parenting.
 
  • #70
Originally posted by BoulderHead
I thought he was talking about parenting.

Oooo. I get this. Naughty Boulderhead!
 
  • #71
Naughty Woody !
{pun intended)
 
  • #72
Originally posted by dduardo
jimmy p has outlined a possible procedure for males. Now we need someone from the opposite sex to propose a procedure for the females.

and when we're done with those should we proceed to SHEmales?
 
  • #73
Originally posted by BoulderHead
Naughty Woody !
{pun intended)

LMAO! And I'm at Work no less!
 
  • #74
Originally posted by Sonty
and when we're done with those should we proceed to SHEmales?

I'm not going to touch that with a 10 foot pole ( No pun intented)
 
Last edited:
  • #75
hmmmm...wouldnt she-males be the same as males? Except that no-one has to watch, we'll just take the she-males word for it! unless anyone is into that sort of thing

maybe i should have done what dduardo is doing and keeping away from the subject. I'm going to have nightmares when i [zz)] tonight!
 
  • #76
well dduardo, actually in new hampshire... where i live, the law is 17 and under for sex, plus the age difference rule, 5 years or 3 i forget... aside from that... we're talking about scientific reaseach for the benifit of all mankind!

but hey jimmy! who says i'd by first to jump up and play the masturbating female guinea pig? not to say i wouldn't... it depends who's watching... hahaha... i mean, anything in the name of science right?
 
  • #77
Originally posted by Gale17
People who fantasize often, and have vivid detailed fantasies are usually more intelligent than those who don't. Kinda makes you wonder about the kind of things einstein thought about... or all them other genius'... hmm... guess i must be a genius too then :wink:
Einstein probably fantasized about sexy equations. So even his more personal efforts were focused toward science.

Ever see the Seinfeld episode where George stops having sex and becomes a genius and Elaine does too and becomes an idiot?
 
  • #78
Originally posted by russ_watters
Ever see the Seinfeld episode where George stops having sex and becomes a genius and Elaine does too and becomes an idiot?
Yes, I saw it, that was funny :)
 
  • #79
LOL that's the spirit Gale! though i wouldn't want the research rejected because it was morally wrong as the test subject was too young...it would have to take place in New Hampshire cos english rules are odd.

Lol and of course i would be head of the team so i would have to do some recording (watching results)...maybe the research should be postponed till after your birthday. Or of course to save getting in trouble we would recruit elsewhere, i mean I am , I am hip and young, it should be no problem getting ppl in for research... MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (prob shouldn't have added that bit)

Im on Gales signature, do dodo do do DOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

ps. the silly rules for Britain..you are legally allowed to have sex at 16 but can't watch x-rated videos/by magazines until you are 18. So technically if you filmed yourself at 16 having intercourse you legally couldn't watch it until 2 years later!
 
Last edited:
  • #80
Laws suck, and so does sonty's post, wtf was that about?
 
  • #81
Originally posted by Andy
Laws suck, and so does sonty's post, wtf was that about?

be afraid, be very afraid! lol. I'm not sure what would possesses someone to ask that...someone always has to push the swing too hard to watch the kid fly. tch!:wink:
 
  • #82
Okay since this is a math/science forum I think that we need to quantify the activities being described. So what is the value of n where n represents the number of times a day that you masturbate? In this case n >= 3.
 
  • #83
At the rate described above, how many days does it take you to develop a new calous?




I'm still shocked there is a 7 page long topic about masterbation.

lol
 
  • #84
Originally posted by megashawn
At the rate described above, how many days does it take you to develop a new calous?




I'm still shocked there is a 7 page long topic about masterbation.

lol

LOL that's pretty funny! I suppose it is an interesting topic...? Maybe a lot of people have experience they want to share with everyone
 
  • #85
Wow this thread moves fast! First of all, I found Gale's openness to the testing a little disturbing, unless that was a joke, can't tell how serious you were.
russ, I saw that Seinfeld episode, it was great! I liked the trash bag analogy, LOL!
jimmy, those laws are nuts, and so are the ones about the press, given the recent accussations that are about something, against someone, and involving someone else, but are denied anyway. Luckily, I live in the US and know everything they thought was worth reporting on it (which isn't much though, I think everyone has already forgot).
Why does jimmy want to be in Gale's signature so bad? Why does everyone change their signatures so often?
 
Last edited:
  • #86
Originally posted by Andy
Laws suck, and so does sonty's post, wtf was that about?

that started off as a pun. then i realized it was stupid and it kind of makes you puke. i realized i could throw some **** towards the fan and see how it splatters around.

Originally posted by jimmy p
someone always has to push the swing too hard to watch the kid fly

it would be the best unpleasant experience in his life, wouldn't it? don't just watch, take pictures! A sadistic laugh would be in order...

Originally posted by Gale17
People who fantasize often, and have vivid detailed fantasies are usually more intelligent than those who don't. Kinda makes you wonder about the kind of things einstein thought about... or all them other genius'... hmm... guess i must be a genius too then

There's a bit of tantric stuff in there. Redirect your sexual energy towards science... Does anyone keep some paper and a pen close when having sex? Then could you describe them as sex toys?
 
  • #87
Originally posted by Jonathan
Wow this thread moves fast! First of all, I found Gale's openness to the testing a little disturbing, unless that was a joke, can't tell how serious you were.

...<snip>

Why does jimmy want to be in Gale's signature so bad? Why does everyone change their signatures so often?

lol, i always tend to be a bit disturbing in these threads... awell, maybe i was kidding, maybe i wasn't. Either way it takes away from my fun if i tell you, so you'll have to guess...


And jimmy wants to be in my sig so bad cause I'm awesome and who wouldn't want a mention? Maybe you missed something johnny boy, but yeah, I'm awesome!

and everyone changes their sigs so often cause i do, and I'm so cool and everyone wants to be like me! ...on second note, anyone else think I'm a but too cocky? ...people must change them for the same reasons i do... they just feel like something new, and my case, i want something new like every other day...
 
  • #88
*coughegocough*

Anyways... you I wouldn't want to be you, because I'd never leave my house:wink: (so it doesn't sound like I'm being mean to gale-I know the gale fan club is strong the obvious 2nd part to this is that I'd spend all playing with myself

But hey, you have to give us more:wink::wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #89
OK.but no one hasent REALLY answered my question................DOES MASTERBATION MAKE YOU GO BLIND?
 
  • #90
No, I have perfect vision.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
279
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
944
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
390
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
921