Can blind individuals excel in mathematics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    stephen hawking
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether blind individuals can excel in mathematics, examining the experiences of blind mathematicians, the nature of mathematical thinking, and the potential advantages or challenges faced by those who cannot see. The scope includes personal anecdotes, historical examples, and theoretical considerations related to mathematical reasoning and intuition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the feasibility of studying advanced mathematics without visual aids, suggesting that visual thinking is essential for understanding concepts like calculus.
  • Others provide examples of blind mathematicians, such as Bernard Morin and Larry Wos, arguing that it is indeed possible to excel in mathematics without sight.
  • A participant mentions that a blind engineer at their workplace uses mental visualization techniques, indicating that non-visual thinking can be effective.
  • Some argue that blindness may provide certain advantages in higher-dimensional thinking, as it removes biases associated with visual representations.
  • Concerns are raised about the generalization of personal experiences regarding visual thinking, suggesting that cognitive processes vary among individuals.
  • Several anecdotes highlight the capabilities of blind instructors and mathematicians, emphasizing their ability to perform complex tasks without visual input.
  • Speculation exists regarding whether blind mathematicians would have performed even better if they had sight, though this remains a personal opinion rather than a consensus.
  • Historical figures like Euler and Norbert Wiener are mentioned as examples of mathematicians who continued to produce significant work after losing their sight.
  • One participant theorizes that some of the best geometers may be blind due to their lack of visual bias towards three-dimensional shapes.
  • Chess masters with exceptional memory skills are referenced to illustrate the potential of mental visualization in complex tasks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the idea that blind individuals can excel in mathematics while others remain skeptical. No consensus is reached regarding the overall capabilities of blind mathematicians compared to their sighted counterparts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of mathematical intuition, the subjective nature of personal experiences, and the lack of empirical evidence to support claims about the advantages or disadvantages of blindness in mathematical reasoning.

MathJakob
Messages
161
Reaction score
5
Is it possible to be blind and still be a mathematician? I can't see how anyone can study calculus and other type of math in your head without ever being able to see what you're doing. I think most people have to see their work to understand what to do next, notice patterns ect.

I heard that stephen hawking does all his physics equations in his head... I don't see how this is possible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When I was an undergrad at Oxford there was a blind student majoring in math in my year, so it must be possible.
 
It would seem that imagining turning a sphere inside-out requires a lot of visual thinking. That may be how the sighted attack the problem, but one of the key players in solving this topological problem went blind at the age of 6.

Here are some articles on Bernard Marin.
http://www.ams.org/notices/200210/comm-morin.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Morin
http://torus.math.uiuc.edu/jms/Papers/isama/color/opt2.htm

Another famous blind mathematician is Larry Wos.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Wos
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~wos/uofc-bio.html

Here's a profile of four STEM professionals who are blind.
https://nfb.org/images/nfb/publications/fr/fr23/fr06fal02.htm

And some more:
http://www.blindscience.org/blind-stem-professionals


To sum things up, "Blind mathematicians? Certainly!"
https://nfb.org/images/nfb/publications/bm/bm12/bm1207/bm120702.htm
 
FWIW, one of our engineers at work has a PhD in topology, and he usually shuts his eyes when thinking about hard problems, whether or not they involve topology.

Maybe the OP never heard the saying "listening to the radio always beats watching TV, because the pictures are better."
 
I believe it can even be an advantage. Once you go to higher dimensional objects it's impossible (for me at least) to visualize them. Yet I still try to do so and most of the time it's taking me more time to try that and fail than to write down rigorously what I know and work from there. *
On the other hand, some of the intuition in maths comes from being able to sketch functions and schematics of spaces, so I don't know whether blind mathematicians can form such an intuition.

When doing trigonometry it's different I believe because you need a very thorough description of the entire situation. And a sketch always makes things a lot easier.

* I had the same problem with tensors, I looked at them as vectors, dual vectors and matrices. Yet this captures very little of the beauty of applying tensors in physics. Just yesterday it occurred to me that I should consider them tensors, nothing more nothing less.
 
MathJakob said:
Is it possible to be blind and still be a mathematician? I can't see how anyone can study calculus and other type of math in your head without ever being able to see what you're doing. I think most people have to see their work to understand what to do next, notice patterns ect.

There are visual thinkers, there are non visual thinkers. You are probably doing a classical error of generalizing your own experience to everyone else. That's not how the psychology (when it does its best to be a serious science) works.
 
Those blind mathematicians who excel would have excelled even more if they had been seeing.
 
arildno said:
Those blind mathematicians who excel would have excelled even more if they had been seeing.

Speculation/personal opinion.
 
Borek said:
Speculation/personal opinion.
Not really.
Why do you think, for example, that LOGICAL intuition, as a feature of the brain is something independent of the sensory functionality of the same brain?
That is the underlying premise of the idea that one could do away with all the senses and retain the same sense of logical intuition.

THAT is speculative to a fault; regarding the "higher mental faculties" as surprising by-products of the "lower sensory capacities" is not.
 
  • #10
One of my instructors in college was blind. He wrote equations on the board, kept track of everything that he wrote and answered questions on various parts. We all kept expecting him to make mistakes but he never did. It was fascinating to watch.
 
  • #11
Borg said:
One of my instructors in college was blind. He wrote equations on the board, kept track of everything that he wrote and answered questions on various parts. We all kept expecting him to make mistakes but he never did. It was fascinating to watch.

Exceptional! :smile:
But it does not follow from this that it is equally exceptional to be a highly gifted mathematician when one compares the set of the seeing vs. the set of the blind.
 
  • #12
A interesting article which provides some insight on the topic.
The World of Blind Mathematicians
-American mathematical society(1246. NOTICES OF THE AMS. VOLUME 49, NUMBER 10)

I would quote some excerpts but I just can't decide what to quote and what to leave out...just read the whole thing- its worth it.
 
  • #13
I referenced that article in post #3, but I did so poorly.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
D H said:
I referenced that article in post #3.

Ooops:redface:
Didn't read the link as I thought it was only about Marin...Its about blindness and math in general :approve:
(post deleted)
 
  • #15
Enigman said:
Ooops:redface:
Didn't read the link as I thought it was only about Marin...
(post deleted)
No reason to be embarrassed. I'm the one who should be embarrassed as I should have given a better preface to that link.

I restored your post because it gives a better description of the article.
 
  • #16
Euler went blind in one eye, then the other, but his mathematical output continued more or less unabated.

Of course, that was long after Euler had already become very well established in his field (and he'd completed all the basic "studies").

It's akin to Hawking being almost completely paralysed and still being able to do advanced physics and mathematics pretty much in his head.
 
  • #17
Curious3141 said:
Euler went blind in one eye, then the other, but his mathematical output continued more or less unabated.

he said he'd have less distraction
 
  • #18
Curious3141 said:
It's akin to Hawking being almost completely paralysed and still being able to do advanced physics and mathematics pretty much in his head.

I may be wrong, but I recall a documentary from a few years back that Hawking was in. It stated that his grad students helped him out a fair bit (using the computers, doing math etc.).
 
  • #19
I think Norbert Wiener went blind and did some work after that, had to have some help, it is in his autobiog.

The unbelievable but true examples of chess masters beating everybody in simultaneous matches suggest everything could be achieved but not necessarily by many people.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
One of my professors told me that some of the best geometers in the world are blind. He theorized that it is because they aren't "biased" towards seeing 3d, euclidean shapes, etc
 
  • #21
1MileCrash said:
One of my professors told me that some of the best geometers in the world are blind. He theorized that it is because they aren't "biased" towards seeing 3d, euclidean shapes, etc

I think this may be true because you're working with a totally blank canvas, nothing to distract you.


epenguin said:
The unbelievable but true examples of chess masters beating everybody in simultaneous matches suggest everything could be achieved but not necessarily by many people.

Like Magnus Carlsen was the worlds youngest grandmaster at age 13 and he was on 60 minutes tv show where he played 10 games of chess simultaneously and was facing away from the boards from start to finnish. He won all 10.

He said that is the great thing about chess, that you can create the board in your head and play from that. Then the interviewer said well keeping track of all the peices in your head from just 1 game is hard enough, and you can do 10?

That is crazy insane memory.
 
  • #23
Leonhard Euler suffered an fever which caused the loss of sight in his right eye when he was a young man. Later, as he aged, a cataract robbed him of sight in his left eye, leaving him blind. Euler had a tremendous memory, though, and, with the help of scribes, was able to dictate his mathematical and scientific papers. Euler is famously known for the volume of his scientific and mathematical writings, the amount of which was not diminished following the onset of total blindness.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonhard_Euler
 
  • #24
Also to note I'm not only talking about people who learned math and then went blind, how about someone who is born blind?
 
  • #25
Maybe they wonder how we can concentrate with so many distractions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=919GzqpFDBk#t=91
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
28
Views
4K