I know there is no such thing as anti-acceleration but if there was

  • Thread starter Thread starter eXmag
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the hypothetical concept of "anti-acceleration" in relation to anti-gravitons, questioning whether such a term could accurately describe the behavior of these particles. Participants note that the graviton is believed to be its own antiparticle, complicating the idea of anti-gravity. The conversation highlights that while gravity causes objects to accelerate towards the ground, the notion of something accelerating "towards the sky" raises questions about the nature of this acceleration. Ultimately, the thread emphasizes that speculation beyond established scientific understanding is not permitted. The discussion concludes with the thread being closed due to these speculative elements.
eXmag
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I know there is no such thing as anti-acceleration but if there was would it be the correct way in describing the acceleration of the hypothetical anti-graviton?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What are you talking about? The anti-particle of a graviton would behave exactly the same as the normal graviton, as I believe the graviton is its own anti-particle since it's a spin-2 boson.
 


Ya its tough to make sense of what I mean, basically as something falls to the ground its accelerating due to gravity. So if something falls towards the sky its accelerating as well. Suppose this "anti-gravity" or "anti-graviton" is the result, would this different acceleration become the anti-acceleration? This is completely hypothetical mind you.
 


Unknown, such a thing is not known to be possible. I've seen math that says matter responding differently to gravity like this would still accelerate in the same direction, so I want to say no.
 


eXmag said:
I know there is no such thing as anti-acceleration but if there was would it be the correct way in describing the acceleration of the hypothetical anti-graviton?

eXmag said:
Ya its tough to make sense of what I mean, basically as something falls to the ground its accelerating due to gravity. So if something falls towards the sky its accelerating as well. Suppose this "anti-gravity" or "anti-graviton" is the result, would this different acceleration become the anti-acceleration? This is completely hypothetical mind you.

We do not permit speculation outside of mainstream science here on the PF. This thread is closed.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top