I need to prove that the following is not surjective. how do i do

  • Thread starter Thread starter donmkeys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surjective
donmkeys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i need to prove that the following is not surjective. how do i do that?

let f:R->R be the function defined by f(x)=x^2 + 3x +4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You need to find at least one point in the codomain for which there is no mapping from the domain through f.

In other words, that function can only be surjective if we can choose some x to make f(x) equal to any value we like in R.

Clearly this function is bounded below by its minimum at x = -1.5,
which is f(-1.5) = 2.25 -4.5 + 4 = 1.75.

Observing that f has a minimum value of 1.75, we see that it is impossible to find any x in the real numbers such that f(x) is less than 1.75, thus f is not a surjective function.
 


donmkeys said:
i need to prove that the following is not surjective. how do i do that?

let f:R->R be the function defined by f(x)=x^2 + 3x +4.
The simplest thing to do is to note that the solutions to the equation x^2+ 3x+ 4= 0 are given by
\frac{-3\pm\sqrt{9- 4(1)(4)}}{2}= \frac{-3\pm\sqrt{-7}}{2}
and so are not real numbers.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top