I need to switch a 0.5V to 0.5 to 5.5V seamlessly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan King
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Switch
AI Thread Summary
A circuit is needed to seamlessly switch a 0.46 to 0.55V signal to the ECU during acceleration, while restoring the original 0.55 to 5.5V signal when the engine takes over. The challenge is that only one connector position is available, and the goal is to make the ECU believe the truck is idling during acceleration. Suggestions include using an analog switch or multiplexer, with components like Op-Amps and FETs available for the project. Local electronics stores or same-day shipping from suppliers like DigiKey or Mouser are recommended for sourcing parts. Consideration of circuit adjustments is necessary to ensure proper functionality, and using an SPDT relay may introduce a brief glitch during switching.
Dan King
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a circuit to manipulate an existing signal for an automotive hydraulic hybrid product.

I need to pass on a 0.46 to 0.55V signal to the ECU during accelereration to keep the engine from revving and restore the original signal (0.55 to 5.5V) when the engine takes over.

This would be easy but I only have one position on my connector left.

Basically I need to make the ECU think that the truck is idling while accellerating and then take over and function normally.

Maybe I'm being a bonehead, but it seems this should be possible.

I won't complicate this more with the other accellerator input.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Look up analog switch / analog multiplexer.
 
That is the kind of thing I need. Just trying to get it done by Monday with the parts we have laying around: Op-Amps, FET's, etc. New customers are coming this week so I need to get something working.

Thanks for the reply.
 
Dan King said:
That is the kind of thing I need. Just trying to get it done by Monday with the parts we have laying around: Op-Amps, FET's, etc. New customers are coming this week so I need to get something working.

Thanks for the reply.

I'd hit the phones and call up the Radioshacks (a few may still carry components), components places, and friends who are electronics hobbyists around you locally. That or bite the bullet and pay for same-day shipping from DigiKey or Mouser.

I'd also go armed with a part number, for instance, CD4051:
http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/CD%2FCD4051BC.pdf

Good luck!

EDIT: Note that many analog switches are made from FETs in linear mode:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOSFET#Single-type_MOSFET_switch
http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~jones/es154/lectures/lecture_4/mosfet/mos_circuits/cmos_gate/maxim/maxim.html

However, you may have to fiddle with the circuit so that it works properly...

Alternately, you might consider an SPDT relay, however, you might end up with a split second of glitching (if that's a significant issue) when the relay is switching from one contact to the other, and no connection exists.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top