I never realised it back then, but now

  • Thread starter Thread starter SPYazdani
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Mathematics is often undervalued in high school, leading many to view it as a tedious subject. However, a deeper understanding reveals its significance and enjoyment, particularly in higher education. A 27-year-old undergraduate studying Telecommunications Engineering in Sydney has recently discovered this appreciation after completing advanced mathematics courses, including Random Processes and Fourier Transforms. Reflecting on past experiences, they recognize the importance of grasping mathematical concepts rather than relying solely on rote learning. The individual is contemplating a shift to a pure mathematics course but feels behind in foundational knowledge. They have been proactive in self-study, revisiting algebra and trigonometry. The key decision lies in whether to continue with Telecommunications Engineering or pursue mathematics more seriously. The consensus suggests that if they still enjoy Telecommunications, they should continue with it while also exploring mathematics courses that interest them. Their current coursework indicates they are not significantly behind in their mathematical understanding.
SPYazdani
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Back when I was in high school, learning mathematics, I didn't understand how valuable mathematics is. I've now come to realize that you can't learn maths by some recipe that your teacher taught you, but rather grasping the concept, visualising what is happening, understanding the symbols and eventually being able to find problems and solve them based on the knowledge you've gained.

I'm now a 27 year old undergrad (made some bad choices in my life and fallen over a few times, which are unsuitable for discussion in these forums), studying Telecommunications Engineering at a University in Sydney. I've just finished Maths for Engineers 3 this semester which discussed 4 main topics: Random Processes, Complex line integrals, Partial Differential Equations and Fourier series and Transforms. It wasn't until I finished Maths for Engineers 2 where I realized that maths is actually enjoyable and not just a boring chore.

While I was in high school, I didn't pay much attention to what was going on. I didn't make the connections that they were trying to teach me and I just simply brushed maths off as a boring plug and chug subject. Now after finishing Eng Maths 3, I've gained an appreciation for the past mathematicians and the brain power that they had to come up with new concepts and methods to solving problems, eg Fourier, Euler and many more.

I've thought about moving into a pure maths course but don't know where to start. I now understand how maths can be enjoyable and how it can benefit us. The problem is, I feel as if I am 15 years behind and need to catch up.

Last year, I found my dad's old Algebra book and Trigonometry book and started reading from beginning to end, attempting the problems and checking my solutions. I've been doing this for the past year or so on my weekends and whenever I get a spare moment.

What do I do? Drop the maths and continue with B Eng (Telecommunications) or drop the Telecomms or continue what I am doing and do both and see where I end up when I graduate?

Any/all advice appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the big question here is do you still like Telecommunications Engineering? If you find that you are starting to care less and less about the subject to the point where you don't see yourself being happy at all doing it, then I would say make the switch to math.

If however you find that you enjoy both subjects, then keep the Telecommunications Engineering and take as many math courses that you find interesting (and can fit into your schedule) in addition to your engineering courses.

Also, based off the topics you listed for your Math for Engineers course, you don't seem 15 years behind the times to me.

Hope this helps!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top