I think this involves Leibniz theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Leibniz Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the expression f(x) + f(1/x) for the function f(x) defined as the integral of log(t)/(1+t) from 1 to x. Participants explore the application of Leibniz's theorem to derive f'(x) and f'(1/x), leading to the conclusion that the derivative of the combined function equals log(x)/x. There is a consensus that integrating both sides of the equation yields (1/2)(log(x))^2, which matches one of the answer choices. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper notation and the correct interpretation of derivatives in this context. Ultimately, the correct evaluation shows that f(x) + f(1/x) simplifies to (1/2)(log(x))^2.
Raghav Gupta
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
76

Homework Statement


For x> 0 , let f(x) = $$\int _1^x \frac{log t dt }{1+t}$$
Then ## f(x) + f(1/x)## is equal to :

A. ##¼ (log x)^2 ##

B. ## ½ (log x)^2 ##

C. ##log x ##

D. ## ¼ log x^2 ##

Homework Equations


Suppose f(x) = $$\int _1^x g(t)$$
Then by Leibniz rule ,
f' (x) = g(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found f' (x) = logx/(1+x)
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
f' (x) + f'(1/x) = logx/x
Now what to do?
We can integrate both sides but a constant will appear which we don't know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!
I think this question doesn't require the leibnitz rule. I think it CAN be done by :
f(x)=∫1x(logt/1+t)dt
Substituting t=1/k
dt=-dk/k2
1 will be 1
And x will become 1/x
Then f(x)=∫11/x[log k/k(k+1)]dk
Then you can find f(1/x) from this equation and add that to the original f(x).
But I am getting an answer that is not any of the options . I think I am getting a wrong f(1/x). If this method works , can you give the steps? I would be very thankful.
 
I am getting solving your attempt,
f(x) + f(1/x) = $$ \int_1^{1/x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} + \int_1^{x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} $$
How we'll solve further?
 
Raghav Gupta said:
I am getting solving your attempt,
f(x) + f(1/x) = $$ \int_1^{1/x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} + \int_1^{x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} $$
How we'll solve further?
Instead of using the new f(x) , use the original one( given in the question).
 
I am then getting,
same result.
How you have evaluated the integral?
 
I am saying that:
f(x)+f(1/x)=
1x(log t/1+t)dt[i.e the original integrand]+∫1xlog[log t /t(t+1)]dt [i have replaced k with t]
 
mooncrater said:
I am saying that:
f(x)+f(1/x)=
1x(log t/1+t)dt[i.e the original integrand]+∫1xlog[log t /t(t+1)]dt [i have replaced k with t]
Mistake in bold part.
That bold part should not be there.
Then we'll simply get,
1x (logt/t)
= (logt)2/2
Putting limits,
1/2 (logx)2
Got it
Thanks buddy.
Can you tell what was wrong in my attempt?
 
  • Like
Likes mooncrater
Are you talking about post #1? No ., sorry I don't know how to do this question by that method. You are right about the unavaibility of constant of integration that would be needed...
 
But we are getting that answer only if we don't take into account constant of integration, in post 1 attempt.
 
  • #10
Raghav Gupta said:
But we are getting that answer only if we don't take into account constant of integration, in post 1 attempt.

You can determine the constant of integration. Put ##x=1##.
 
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta
  • #11
We'll get 2f(1) = 0 + c
Now f(1) = 0
So c= 0.
How did you think that we should put x = 1 ?
 
  • #12
Raghav Gupta said:
We'll get 2f(1) = 0 + c
Now f(1) = 0
So c= 0.
How did you think that we should put x = 1 ?

So ##f(1)=0## tells you the constant of integration must be zero. What's the question?
 
  • #13
But instead of writing question again, I think you could see it yourself in post 1.
I think you mean something else.
Integral from 1 to 1 is zero.
 
  • #14
Raghav Gupta said:
But instead of writing question again, I think you could see it yourself in post 1.
I think you mean something else.
Integral from 1 to 1 is zero.

Integrating both sides as in post 1 gives you ##\frac{1}{2} (log(x))^2+C=f(x)+f(1/x)## where ##C## is the constant of integration. Putting ##x=1## shows that ##C=0##. Isn't that what you wanted to know?
 
  • #15
Yeah. Thanks.
 
  • #16
Dick said:
Integrating both sides as in post 1 gives you ##\frac{1}{2} (log(x))^2+C=f(x)+f(1/x)## where ##C## is the constant of integration. Putting ##x=1## shows that ##C=0##. Isn't that what you wanted to know?
Yes, but How you got the idea that we'll find C if we'll put x = 1?
 
  • #17
Raghav Gupta said:
Yes, but How you got the idea that we'll find C if we'll put x = 1?

It's the same way you eliminate a constant of integration when you are solving other differential equations. You substitute a point where the functions of ##x## are known and find ##C##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta
  • #18
Raghav Gupta said:
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
Shouldn't ##f'(1/x) =-xlog x/1+x ##
 
  • #19
mooncrater said:
Shouldn't ##f'(1/x) =-xlog x/1+x ##

Why it should be?
Apply Leibniz rule. Can you show what you have done?
For x> 0 , let f(x) = $$\int _1^x \frac{log t dt }{1+t}$$
Then ## f(x) + f(1/x)## is equal to :Suppose f(x) = $$\int _1^x g(t)$$
Then by Leibniz rule ,
f' (x) = g(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found f' (x) = logx/(1+x)
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
f' (x) + f'(1/x) = logx/x
 
  • #20
Raghav Gupta said:
Why it should be?
Apply Leibniz rule. Can you show what you have done?
For x> 0 , let f(x) = $$\int _1^x \frac{log t dt }{1+t}$$
Then ## f(x) + f(1/x)## is equal to :Suppose f(x) = $$\int _1^x g(t)$$
Then by Leibniz rule ,
f' (x) = g(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found f' (x) = logx/(1+x)
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
f' (x) + f'(1/x) = logx/x

The notation ##f'(1/x)## should be avoided in this problem; it means ##\left. f'(t) \right|_{t = 1/x}## in standard mathematical notation. That is very different from ##(d/dx) f(1/x)##, which is equal to ##-f'(1/x)/x^2##.
 
  • #21
Ray Vickson said:
The notation ##f'(1/x)## should be avoided in this problem; it means ##\left. f'(t) \right|_{t = 1/x}## in standard mathematical notation.
But I wanted to imply that only.
Then I think I am correct?
 
  • #22
Raghav Gupta said:
But I wanted to imply that only.
Then I think I am correct?

The correct result is ##(d/dx)[f(x) + f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x## and that is not what you wrote.
 
  • #23
Ray Vickson said:
The correct result is ##(d/dx)[f(x) + f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x## and that is not what you wrote.
Okay, got it. I wanted to imply this
##(d/dx)f(x) + (d/dx)f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x##
 
  • #24
Raghav Gupta said:
Okay, got it. I wanted to imply this
##(d/dx)f(x) + (d/dx)f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x##

This is correct, but ##(d/dx) f(1/x) \neq f'(1/x)##; in fact, ##(d/dx) f(1/x) = - f'(1/x)/x^2##.

Notation is always an issue in problems of this type, so sometimes the best compromise is to use a "differential operator" such as ##D_x## to denote ##d/dx##, so that the ##x##-derivative of ##f(1/x)## could be denoted as ##D_x f(1/x)##, which equals ##-\frac{1}{x^2} f'(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K