I think this involves Leibniz theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Leibniz Theorem
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the expression \( f(x) + f(1/x) \) where \( f(x) \) is defined as the integral \( \int_1^x \frac{\log t}{1+t} dt \). Participants are exploring the implications of Leibniz's theorem and various methods to approach the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to differentiate \( f(x) \) using Leibniz's rule, while others suggest alternative methods such as substitution. There are discussions about the implications of constants of integration and how they affect the evaluation of the integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some have provided insights into the differentiation process, while others are clarifying notation and the implications of integration constants.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings regarding the application of Leibniz's rule and the notation used for derivatives. There is also a focus on the need for clarity in the steps taken to evaluate the integrals involved.

Raghav Gupta
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
76

Homework Statement


For x> 0 , let f(x) = $$\int _1^x \frac{log t dt }{1+t}$$
Then ## f(x) + f(1/x)## is equal to :

A. ##¼ (log x)^2 ##

B. ## ½ (log x)^2 ##

C. ##log x ##

D. ## ¼ log x^2 ##

Homework Equations


Suppose f(x) = $$\int _1^x g(t)$$
Then by Leibniz rule ,
f' (x) = g(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found f' (x) = logx/(1+x)
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
f' (x) + f'(1/x) = logx/x
Now what to do?
We can integrate both sides but a constant will appear which we don't know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!
I think this question doesn't require the leibnitz rule. I think it CAN be done by :
f(x)=∫1x(logt/1+t)dt
Substituting t=1/k
dt=-dk/k2
1 will be 1
And x will become 1/x
Then f(x)=∫11/x[log k/k(k+1)]dk
Then you can find f(1/x) from this equation and add that to the original f(x).
But I am getting an answer that is not any of the options . I think I am getting a wrong f(1/x). If this method works , can you give the steps? I would be very thankful.
 
I am getting solving your attempt,
f(x) + f(1/x) = $$ \int_1^{1/x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} + \int_1^{x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} $$
How we'll solve further?
 
Raghav Gupta said:
I am getting solving your attempt,
f(x) + f(1/x) = $$ \int_1^{1/x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} + \int_1^{x} \frac{logk dk}{k(k+1)} $$
How we'll solve further?
Instead of using the new f(x) , use the original one( given in the question).
 
I am then getting,
same result.
How you have evaluated the integral?
 
I am saying that:
f(x)+f(1/x)=
1x(log t/1+t)dt[i.e the original integrand]+∫1xlog[log t /t(t+1)]dt [i have replaced k with t]
 
mooncrater said:
I am saying that:
f(x)+f(1/x)=
1x(log t/1+t)dt[i.e the original integrand]+∫1xlog[log t /t(t+1)]dt [i have replaced k with t]
Mistake in bold part.
That bold part should not be there.
Then we'll simply get,
1x (logt/t)
= (logt)2/2
Putting limits,
1/2 (logx)2
Got it
Thanks buddy.
Can you tell what was wrong in my attempt?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mooncrater
Are you talking about post #1? No ., sorry I don't know how to do this question by that method. You are right about the unavaibility of constant of integration that would be needed...
 
But we are getting that answer only if we don't take into account constant of integration, in post 1 attempt.
 
  • #10
Raghav Gupta said:
But we are getting that answer only if we don't take into account constant of integration, in post 1 attempt.

You can determine the constant of integration. Put ##x=1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raghav Gupta
  • #11
We'll get 2f(1) = 0 + c
Now f(1) = 0
So c= 0.
How did you think that we should put x = 1 ?
 
  • #12
Raghav Gupta said:
We'll get 2f(1) = 0 + c
Now f(1) = 0
So c= 0.
How did you think that we should put x = 1 ?

So ##f(1)=0## tells you the constant of integration must be zero. What's the question?
 
  • #13
But instead of writing question again, I think you could see it yourself in post 1.
I think you mean something else.
Integral from 1 to 1 is zero.
 
  • #14
Raghav Gupta said:
But instead of writing question again, I think you could see it yourself in post 1.
I think you mean something else.
Integral from 1 to 1 is zero.

Integrating both sides as in post 1 gives you ##\frac{1}{2} (log(x))^2+C=f(x)+f(1/x)## where ##C## is the constant of integration. Putting ##x=1## shows that ##C=0##. Isn't that what you wanted to know?
 
  • #15
Yeah. Thanks.
 
  • #16
Dick said:
Integrating both sides as in post 1 gives you ##\frac{1}{2} (log(x))^2+C=f(x)+f(1/x)## where ##C## is the constant of integration. Putting ##x=1## shows that ##C=0##. Isn't that what you wanted to know?
Yes, but How you got the idea that we'll find C if we'll put x = 1?
 
  • #17
Raghav Gupta said:
Yes, but How you got the idea that we'll find C if we'll put x = 1?

It's the same way you eliminate a constant of integration when you are solving other differential equations. You substitute a point where the functions of ##x## are known and find ##C##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raghav Gupta
  • #18
Raghav Gupta said:
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
Shouldn't ##f'(1/x) =-xlog x/1+x ##
 
  • #19
mooncrater said:
Shouldn't ##f'(1/x) =-xlog x/1+x ##

Why it should be?
Apply Leibniz rule. Can you show what you have done?
For x> 0 , let f(x) = $$\int _1^x \frac{log t dt }{1+t}$$
Then ## f(x) + f(1/x)## is equal to :Suppose f(x) = $$\int _1^x g(t)$$
Then by Leibniz rule ,
f' (x) = g(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found f' (x) = logx/(1+x)
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
f' (x) + f'(1/x) = logx/x
 
  • #20
Raghav Gupta said:
Why it should be?
Apply Leibniz rule. Can you show what you have done?
For x> 0 , let f(x) = $$\int _1^x \frac{log t dt }{1+t}$$
Then ## f(x) + f(1/x)## is equal to :Suppose f(x) = $$\int _1^x g(t)$$
Then by Leibniz rule ,
f' (x) = g(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found f' (x) = logx/(1+x)
f' ( 1/x) = logx/x(x+1)
f' (x) + f'(1/x) = logx/x

The notation ##f'(1/x)## should be avoided in this problem; it means ##\left. f'(t) \right|_{t = 1/x}## in standard mathematical notation. That is very different from ##(d/dx) f(1/x)##, which is equal to ##-f'(1/x)/x^2##.
 
  • #21
Ray Vickson said:
The notation ##f'(1/x)## should be avoided in this problem; it means ##\left. f'(t) \right|_{t = 1/x}## in standard mathematical notation.
But I wanted to imply that only.
Then I think I am correct?
 
  • #22
Raghav Gupta said:
But I wanted to imply that only.
Then I think I am correct?

The correct result is ##(d/dx)[f(x) + f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x## and that is not what you wrote.
 
  • #23
Ray Vickson said:
The correct result is ##(d/dx)[f(x) + f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x## and that is not what you wrote.
Okay, got it. I wanted to imply this
##(d/dx)f(x) + (d/dx)f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x##
 
  • #24
Raghav Gupta said:
Okay, got it. I wanted to imply this
##(d/dx)f(x) + (d/dx)f(1/x)] = \ln(x)/x##

This is correct, but ##(d/dx) f(1/x) \neq f'(1/x)##; in fact, ##(d/dx) f(1/x) = - f'(1/x)/x^2##.

Notation is always an issue in problems of this type, so sometimes the best compromise is to use a "differential operator" such as ##D_x## to denote ##d/dx##, so that the ##x##-derivative of ##f(1/x)## could be denoted as ##D_x f(1/x)##, which equals ##-\frac{1}{x^2} f'(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Raghav Gupta

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K