I thought I understood double integrals until I saw this

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding and evaluation of double integrals, specifically focusing on the region of integration and the implications of reversing the order of integration. Participants are examining a problem that involves a triangular region defined by certain limits on the variables x and y.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the limits of integration, particularly why x is being run from 0 to 3 when reversing the order of integration. There are attempts to clarify the geometric interpretation of the region and the implications of the limits set by the problem. Some participants suggest that there may be a typo in the problem statement affecting the interpretation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with several participants questioning the validity of the provided limits and the correctness of the tutorial's answer. Some have offered alternative interpretations and calculations, while others seek confirmation of their understanding. There is no explicit consensus, but a productive exploration of the problem is evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may contain a typo, which could explain discrepancies in the expected versus actual outcomes. There is also mention of the complexity introduced by the order of integration and how it affects the evaluation of the integral.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/4764/doubleintegral.png

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Now, my understanding of the region is that x spans from the line x = y to x = 1, and that given that parameter, the applicable y's are 0 to 1.

In other words, my region looks like a right triangle with corners at the (0,0), (1,0), (1,1).

Since the region ends at the line x = 1 due to the parameters of x, my understanding is that the upper limit on y is effectively 1, and that running it to 3 doesn't do anything. So reversing the order of integration, I get that y will span from 0 to y = x, and x will span from 0 to 1.

However, when I click "GO tutorial:"

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6250/doubleintegral2.png

And their final answer is .99.

This has literally destroyed every ounce of comfort I had with the process. WHY are we running x from 0 to 3 when the order of integration is reversed? That's not in the region!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/4764/doubleintegral.png

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Now, my understanding of the region is that x spans from the line x = y to x = 1, and that given that parameter, the applicable y's are 0 to 1.

In other words, my region looks like a right triangle with corners at the (0,0), (1,0), (1,1).

Since the region ends at the line x = 1 due to the parameters of x, my understanding is that the upper limit on y is effectively 1, and that running it to 3 doesn't do anything. So reversing the order of integration, I get that y will span from 0 to y = x, and x will span from 0 to 1.

However, when I click "GO tutorial:"

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6250/doubleintegral2.png

And their final answer is .99.

This has literally destroyed every ounce of comfort I had with the process. WHY are we running x from 0 to 3 when the order of integration is reversed? That's not in the region!

Im still learning double integrals and my intuition was that the upper limit on y is still 3 but you take the negative of that area and add to whatever's under y=1 so you get a negative value.
Thats what I get when I used the double integral calculator. H/e the solutions you shown on the next page are all positive. So I am confused too, any one else please enlighten, I want to know what's going on too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can anyone clarify?
 
1MileCrash said:
Can anyone clarify?

Hey sry if I am wrong about this but I checked the calculation and I believe the answer is wrong it should be
[itex]\int{^1_0}\int{^x_0}\sin(x^2)dydx - \int{^3_1}\int{^3_x}\sin(x^2)dydx[/itex]
I got the same value -0.4343...
 
I would agree, the region as is is a triangle that flips at x=1 and is upside down until x=3. They reversed integration as if it were just one big triangle.

Can anyone confirm?
 
I agree with hqib's answer. So 1milecrash, I think you understand perfectly well. I think almost certainly this problem has some typo in its statement. This type of problem usually appears in a calculus text to illustrate that the order of integration can make a real difference in the difficulty of calculating the integral. But here it doesn't help because in that second integral ##\int_1^3\int_x^3\sin(x^2)dydx## you are going to have a ##3\sin(x^2)## to integrate after you do the inner integral, which is as bad as the original problem. Almost surely a typo.
 
1MileCrash said:
I would agree, the region as is is a triangle that flips at x=1 and is upside down until x=3. They reversed integration as if it were just one big triangle.

Can anyone confirm?

If we let [tex]F(y) = \int_{x=y}^1 \sin(x^2)\, dx \text{ for } y \leq 1 \text{ and } F(y) = -\int_{x=1}^y \sin(x^2) \, dx \text{ for } y > 1,[/tex] then F(y) can be evaluated in terms of Fresnel functions. Evaluation of the integral
[itex]\int_0^3 F(y) \,dy[/itex] involves hypergeometric functions. Maple gets its numerical value as -0.4343175641. I, personally, do not understand the 'tutorial'.

RGV
 
*sigh*

I feel better, I guess, but this kind of thing happens too often. It sucks not having confidence in your textbook's info.

I have never run into a double integral where the two limits did not "end" at the same place graphically.

Thank all for your input.
 
1MileCrash said:
*sigh*

I feel better, I guess, but this kind of thing happens too often. It sucks not having confidence in your textbook's info.

I have never run into a double integral where the two limits did not "end" at the same place graphically.

Thank all for your input.

Actually, I think the typo was that the original problem should have been:$$
\int _0^3\int_y^3\sin(x^2)dxdy$$That would also explain their answer.
 
  • #10
LCKurtz said:
Actually, I think the typo was that the original problem should have been:$$
\int _0^3\int_y^3\sin(x^2)dxdy$$That would also explain their answer.

If we let [tex]F(a) = \int_{y=0}^a \int_{x=y}^a \sin(x^2) \, dx \, dy = \int_{x=0}^a \int_{y=0}^x \sin(x^2) \, dx \, dy = \frac{1}{2}[1 - \cos(a^2)],[/tex] then F(1) = 0.22985 and F(3) = 0.95557. If we want F(a) = 0.99, we need to take a = 1.715009566.

RGV
 
  • #11
I don't know about the .99 or where it came from but the third choice they have marked here:

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6250/doubleintegral2.png

could have come from ##\int _0^3\int_y^3\sin(x^2)dxdy##
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K