I was VERY interested in aerospace engineering, but everyone tells me

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prospects of pursuing a degree in aerospace engineering, including job availability, industry stability, and alternative career paths. Participants express concerns about the future of the aerospace sector, particularly in light of budget cuts and competition for positions, while also exploring related fields and educational pathways.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the job market for aerospace engineering, citing a lack of demand and uncertainty in the industry.
  • Others argue that there are still job opportunities, particularly for young engineers who may replace retiring professionals.
  • A participant mentions that while NASA is a prominent employer, there are many private companies, such as SpaceX, involved in space exploration.
  • It is suggested that an aerospace engineering degree can lead to jobs in related fields like mechanical engineering, which shares similar coursework.
  • Some participants highlight that many aerospace jobs are tied to government contracts, which can be unstable.
  • There is a discussion about the competitiveness of government positions in aerospace and the need for advanced degrees, such as a master's, to improve job prospects.
  • Concerns are raised about the specialized nature of aerospace engineering compared to more general engineering fields, which may offer broader job opportunities.
  • One participant shares their personal experience of struggling to find a job after graduating with a degree in aerospace engineering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express uncertainty about the job market for aerospace engineering, with multiple competing views on the stability and future of the industry. There is no consensus on the best path forward, as opinions vary on the value of pursuing an aerospace degree versus more general engineering disciplines.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the impact of budget cuts on aerospace projects and the potential for job instability due to reliance on government contracts. The discussion also touches on the competitive nature of positions in the field and the necessity of advanced degrees for better employment opportunities.

michojek
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've always loved maths, science and engineering..

I have to pick a degree very soon, but i don't know which..

I was VERY interested in aerospace engineering, but everyone tells me there are NO DEMAND
for this job, or it has no future.

There are few places just as NASA, but I don't think I'm that SMART enough to get in..

I love space, physics and maths

any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There are jobs, especially for young people who are often hired to replace senior, highly paid engineers who retire or are laid off.

On the other hand, aerospace has an uncertain short and medium term future. NASA is in disarray. Science and space exploration budgets have been slashed. The James Webb Space Telescope is behind schedule, pushed out and in danger of cancellation. A decade of NASA's funds were spent (wasted) under Bush on preparing to go to Mars, which wouldn't have happened in my lifetime even with five times the funding. Oh wait, I forgot that Mars is out now anyway. We're going back to the Moon. Oh wait, that was three years ago, now we aren't and to make sure of it the nation canceled the Ares manned rocket and Orion space capsule last year. Well at least there's commercial aviation--look at how well Boeing is doing with new airplanes like the Dreamliner. On second thought, don't look! Consider a move instead to Europe because Airbus is doing great with the monstrous A380...well, no, that's another disaster. There's always military contracting--except that defense spending may be cut by some $500 billion this decade to try to help balance the budget.

You get the idea. There are jobs to be had, good people will always be needed, and young people in particular will be attractive job candidates for the coming half decade as aerospace tries to cut costs, but it's an unsettled industry. On the other hand, the job scene looks better for engineering grads than for new law-school grads...
 
I have the same interest as you, but NASA is not the only company that dose space exploration, there are many private and commercial companies. The big one i can think of off the top of my head is SpaceX. But honestly if that what you really want to it do it.
 
Just because you have a degree in aerospace engineering doesn't mean you HAVE to become one. If you're interested in it take it, and try to get a job. If you can't get the job you want you can always work in many other industries, such as mechanical engineering where the undergraduate coursework is VERY similar (to aerospace) at most schools. You can also change majors after 1st year if you change your mind. Pick aerospace for now, if that's what you want, and go from there.
 
^MECHster is right. An aerospace engineering degree can get you a job in many mechanical areas. Typically, you could work on anything involving air flow principles such as a fuel cell blower.
 
boeing, accenture, raytheon, many satellite manufacturers, ...I have a close friend who did AE and worked for Gov for few years then went to boeing.
 
Last edited:
Many, if not the majority, of employment opportunities in Aerospace are either Research or Defense related. As these are government contracts, they can be terminated at any time.

If you seek regular employment, this is not one of the more stable fields out there. However, if you seek excitement, really high technology, and bleeding edge ideas, this is one place you can find it.
 
Thanks for the reply guys =]

So is it competitive to work for the government in this area?

and YES I AM VERYYYYYYYYYYYYY INTERESTED IN NEW TECHNOLOGY that's why I also looked into research, but i thought that would need quite a bit of experience in this field first.

I was also wondering is they would have similar type in government intelligence?

And for NASA i thought that was WAYYYYYY to competitive and I heard budgets are being cut drastically which shows not much future for aerospace D:
 
Hey guys,

Where is my job? I graduated last December with a bachelors in aerospace and now I seek employment at McDonalds. I'm "trolling" a bit, but I probably have applied for over 40 aerospace jobs though since graduation.

I cannot say I completely know the condition of job availability, but I would highly recommend getting your masters if you intend to do aerospace engineering and go into the field.
 
  • #10
Apophenia said:
I cannot say I completely know the condition of job availability, but I would highly recommend getting your masters if you intend to do aerospace engineering and go into the field.
That's true for many technical fields, not just aero. A masters is the new bachelors for a lot of technical jobs. At least it's not as bad as it is in some other fields, where you pretty much need a PhD to work in that field. Physics, for example.
 
  • #11
Just as an aside, I find it interesting that I see many posts on Physics Forums asking about opportunities in either nuclear engineering or aerospace engineering. My impression has been that, given the specialized nature of the above mentioned fields, there would consequently be fewer opportunities in comparison to more general engineering specialties such as electrical or mechanical engineering.

I would also add that in many engineering schools that I'm familiar with, both nuclear and aerospace engineering are often sub-specialties or options available for students in mechanical engineering. So why not just study mechanical engineering, and think about what to specialize later? (similar for petroleum engineering -- why not study chemical engineering?)
 
  • #12
VanHammer said:
I have the same interest as you, but NASA is not the only company that dose space exploration, there are many private and commercial companies. The big one i can think of off the top of my head is SpaceX. But honestly if that what you really want to it do it.

I think in the coming years we'll see companies like Boeing expanding their horizons as well. Obviously I can't guarantee anything, but I'm optimistic about aerospace becoming an industry that will really grow.
 
  • #13
StatGuy2000 said:
Just as an aside, I find it interesting that I see many posts on Physics Forums asking about opportunities in either nuclear engineering or aerospace engineering. My impression has been that, given the specialized nature of the above mentioned fields, there would consequently be fewer opportunities in comparison to more general engineering specialties such as electrical or mechanical engineering.

I would also add that in many engineering schools that I'm familiar with, both nuclear and aerospace engineering are often sub-specialties or options available for students in mechanical engineering. So why not just study mechanical engineering, and think about what to specialize later? (similar for petroleum engineering -- why not study chemical engineering?)

I can't speak for the others but petro has nothing to do with chemical engineering. chemical engineer does downstream. petro does upstream. petro is about finding the oil and getting it out of the ground.

Chemical engineering is about designing processes to make the compounds chemists and materials scientists came up with in a cheap way with petroleum as one possible feedstock.

Petroleum engineers share more in common with geophysicists than chemical engineers by far. They don't need to know too much about reaction kinetics, for example.
 
  • #14
chill_factor said:
I can't speak for the others but petro has nothing to do with chemical engineering. chemical engineer does downstream. petro does upstream. petro is about finding the oil and getting it out of the ground.

Chemical engineering is about designing processes to make the compounds chemists and materials scientists came up with in a cheap way with petroleum as one possible feedstock.

Petroleum engineers share more in common with geophysicists than chemical engineers by far. They don't need to know too much about reaction kinetics, for example.

I see. I had a misconception about what petroleum engineering was about -- thanks for clarifying it for me.

It sounds to me that petroleum engineering could then be considered a subspecialty of geological engineering (a program offered at the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Waterloo, essentially a combination of civil engineering and geology) or minerals engineering (an interdisciplinary program offered at the University of Toronto, combining civil, chemical and mechanical engineering with geology).

That being said, the question I posed in my post still stands -- why pursue a degree in an overly specialized field of engineering (such as petroleum, nuclear or aerospace) as opposed to a broader field of engineering, with greater scope to work in many different areas (e.g. electrical, mechanical, civil, chemical, etc.)?
 
  • #15
Anything in the energy field is full of many opportunities for a young engineer. Petroleum engineering has already been mentioned. But aero guys are in great demand in the gas turbine and jet engine world, and they are very hard to find.

Billions are being spent to develop new science. Within the next ten years, some of that intensive research will pay off and we will need engineers to make something practical with it in completely new ways.
 
  • #16
Aerospace engineers are pretty versatile. People seem to think aerospace engineers just deal with fluids, but we do all sorts of things: aerodynamics, propulsion, structures, materials science, dynamics, controls.

We go higher, faster, and farther than anyone else.
 
  • #17
Aerospace it is =]
ill let you guys know how it is in 6 years time xD
 
  • #18
Also, if you want to work for NASA, try to get an internship or coop with them.

What schools are you looking at?
 
  • #19
wish i could get an internship or coop..
but I am in Australia..
 
  • #20
Do you really want to worry about job availability befire starting your course? Engineers will always be needed and you can't know how the economy's going to be in 5 years time. Just chose whatever you like best. I don't really know what aerospace engineering is about, but if it's anything like aeronautical engineering, then going to work for NASA isn't the only option.

michojek said:
wish i could get an internship or coop..
but I am in Australia..

So what? I live in Switzerland and I know people from my school who've done internships at NASA.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K