IB Math Methods- Problems with Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronomer107
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ib Math methods
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving two exponential equations involving the mathematical constant e. The first equation, 32^2x = e^(2x + 1), requires careful manipulation, including cross-multiplication and distribution. The second equation, e^(2x) - 5e^x + 6 = 0, cannot be factored and necessitates the use of the quadratic formula. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly grouping exponents and clarifying notation to avoid confusion in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the natural logarithm and its relationship to e
  • Knowledge of the quadratic formula and its application
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential functions, particularly involving the base e
  • Learn how to apply the quadratic formula to equations with exponential terms
  • Explore techniques for simplifying and solving exponential equations
  • Review common notation practices in mathematics to enhance clarity in problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Students studying IB Mathematics, educators teaching exponential functions, and anyone seeking to improve their skills in solving complex algebraic equations involving e.

Astronomer107
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I have a few problems:
Solve
1.
32^2x = e
e^2x +1

I cross multiplied and got 3e^2x = e(e^2x + 1) Then:
3e^2x = e^2x+e And now I don't know what to do from here...

2. Solve

e^2x - 5e+x + 6 = 0

This one can't be factored, so does the quadratic equation work here? If so, how is it done with "e"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I'd double check and make sure you wrote both of these equations correctly. I think you've made at least two typos. Also, you have to group your exponents with parentheses. i.e.:

e^2x = e2x = e2 * x
but
e^(2x) = e2x

People will still understand what you mean, but you should always strive to write things correctly instead of relying on people to read your mind. Generally, you should avoid ever writing e^2x, even if you are using it correctly, because it can generate confusion.



Some things to consider for the first problem:

Did you distribute right?

Can you solve the equation for e2x?


For the second problem:

Once you get the right statement of the problem, consider that e2x = (ex)2
 
Last edited:
Like Hurkyl, I would say that e^2x is almost certainly intended to be e^(2x), but I would not be nearly so sure about e^2x+1 !

Is that intended to be e^(2x)+ 1 or e^(2x+1)? I would say either was likely and they are very different.

IF it were 3e^(2x)/(e^(2x+1)) = e, the left side reduces to
3e^(2x-(2x+1))= 3 e^(-1) which is not e so I guess that was not intended!

3e^(2x)/(e^(2x)+1)= e gives, after you multiply both sides by that denominator, 3e^(2x)= e(e^(2x)+1)= e*e^(2x)+ e. Now, like you learned to do long ago, subtract that e*e^(2x) from both sides to get x on only one side of the equation.

You should now have 3e^(2x)- e e^(2x)= (3-e)e^(2x)= e.

If you have an equation of the form Ax= B, you would divide both sides by A wouldn't you? Okay, divide both sides of the equation by
3-e to get e^(2x)= e/(3-e).

Now the "new" part. How do you get rid of that "e^ " part?
Well, natural logarithm, ln(x) is DEFINED as the inverse (opposite) of e^x. What happens if you take ln of both sides of the equation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K