Iceskating up a Hill: Determining Height with Initial Velocity and Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gurkis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the height an iceskater reaches while gliding up a 20-degree incline with an initial velocity of 8.9 m/s and a friction force of 0.97 N. The skater's weight is 69 kg, and the equations used include gravitational components mg(y) and mg(x). The final calculated height is approximately 4.0 m, confirming that the initial mathematical approach was correct after re-evaluation. The participant successfully identified and corrected minor calculation errors to arrive at the accurate result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions in physics
  • Basic knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Concept of friction and its calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in inclined planes
  • Learn about the effects of friction on motion in physics
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations for varying acceleration
  • Investigate the relationship between initial velocity and maximum height in projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to motion on inclined planes and frictional forces.

Gurkis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An iceskater weighing 69kg is gliding up an incline hill at 20 degrees.
How high up does the skater make it when her initial velocity is 8,9m/s and the friction between her skates and the ice is 0,97N.

Homework Equations



mg(y) = m*g*cos(20)
mg(x) = m*g*sin(20)

The Attempt at a Solution


F(friction) = [itex]\mu[/itex] * mg(y)

F[itex]\rightarrow[/itex] = F(f) + F(mg(x))

a=F[itex]\div[/itex]M[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]F[itex]\div[/itex]m=232,7[itex]\div[/itex]69 = 3,34m/s^2

s = (v^2 - v(o)^2) / 2a = 11,8m

sin(20)*11,8=4,05...[itex]\approx[/itex] 4,1m

the answer should be 4,0m. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics looks good, maths is off...redo the math: you should get something like 4,02 which rounded to two sig figs is 4,0
 
I see, thanks. I thought my problem was that I was thinking about it all wrong. I redid the math and it checks out.

Appreciate the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K