Ideal Simple Machines: Input Work & Power Equal Outputs

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machines
Click For Summary
In ideal simple machines, input work equals output work, achieving 100% efficiency. However, in scenarios like pushing a box up an inclined plane, a smaller force over a longer distance results in lower output power due to increased time. Conversely, in a bicycle, both input and output work and power are equal, facilitated by the chain's efficient transfer of energy. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between work, power, and time, suggesting that variations in power and time can affect efficiency. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the performance of simple machines.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Dear Forum,

in the case of ideal simple machines the input work is exactly ideal to the output work.
The efficiency is 100%.


In some cases the input power is equal to the output power, but not always: when we push a box up an inclined plane we need a smaller force for a longer distance. It will take a longer time (less output power hence) to push the block to the final height than if we simply lifted the block.

In the bicycle case instead, we have both input work=output work and input power= output power. Thanks to the chain, the work is transferred from the front wheel to the rear wheel in the same interval of time. There is some coupling.

How can we phrase the general requirement to achieve input power = output power in simple machines?

Any comment or correction?
thanks
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fisico30 said:
Dear Forum,

in the case of ideal simple machines the input work is exactly ideal to the output work.
The efficiency is 100%.


In some cases the input power is equal to the output power, but not always: when we push a box up an inclined plane we need a smaller force for a longer distance. It will take a longer time (less output power hence) to push the block to the final height than if we simply lifted the block.

In the bicycle case instead, we have both input work=output work and input power= output power. Thanks to the chain, the work is transferred from the front wheel to the rear wheel in the same interval of time. There is some coupling.

How can we phrase the general requirement to achieve input power = output power in simple machines?

Any comment or correction?
thanks
fisico30

What is the equation relating work and power? Writing that equation out should help you to answer your question, I think.
 
Sure,

Power=work/time

so work= power*time

input work=output work

I guess your point, Berkeman, is that if work remains the same, then the product power*time is the same but power and time can be different for the input and output situations: clearly the larger the power the smaller the time.

In the inclined plane case the time is large and power is small.
In the bicycle case, the work (energy) transferred from the front wheel to the rear wheel is the same and also the power is the same since the time is the same...

thanks,
fisico30
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K