lfqm
- 21
- 1
Hey guys, I've recently read about the Tavis-Cummings and Dicke models and I got a little bit confused about them. They are suppoused to model N identical atoms interacting with a one-mode EM field, however the atomic operators are defined in the basis (for the case of two atoms):
\left\{{|e_{1},e_{2}>, |e_{1},g_{2}>, |g_{1},e_{2}>, |g_{1},g_{2}>}\right\}
which obviously makes a distinction between the atoms.
Then it gets even more confusing, as they start working in a spin basis \left\{{|j,m>}\right\} which makes the atoms identical for the case j=N/2... I don't even undestand why they fix j=N/2
Concretely, my question is: What is the basis of the hilbert space the Dicke hamiltonian is acting on (the atomic part)?
The 2^N elements basis (distinguishable atoms), the \displaystyle\sum_{j=0}^{N/2}(2j+1) elements basis (considering all spin values) or the N+1 elements basis (fixing j=N/2).
And what is the form of the atomic operators in this basis?
Thanks
\left\{{|e_{1},e_{2}>, |e_{1},g_{2}>, |g_{1},e_{2}>, |g_{1},g_{2}>}\right\}
which obviously makes a distinction between the atoms.
Then it gets even more confusing, as they start working in a spin basis \left\{{|j,m>}\right\} which makes the atoms identical for the case j=N/2... I don't even undestand why they fix j=N/2
Concretely, my question is: What is the basis of the hilbert space the Dicke hamiltonian is acting on (the atomic part)?
The 2^N elements basis (distinguishable atoms), the \displaystyle\sum_{j=0}^{N/2}(2j+1) elements basis (considering all spin values) or the N+1 elements basis (fixing j=N/2).
And what is the form of the atomic operators in this basis?
Thanks
