MHB Identifying Celestial Pole in Photo Taken 02/21/2010

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vi Nguyen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo Pole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a photograph taken on 02/21/2010, where the user believes they captured the celestial pole. However, it is clarified that what appears in the image is likely due to atmospheric effects, such as water and ice crystals refracting sunlight, rather than any celestial phenomenon. The user compares their photo to a Wikipedia image, trying to rationalize their observation. Despite their curiosity about Earth's axial tilt and its relation to the sun, it is emphasized that there is no physical manifestation of the celestial pole. Ultimately, the consensus is that the observed line is not a reflection of any celestial axis.
Vi Nguyen
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I took this picture on 02/21/2010, and I saw a line that I called it celestial pole. But I am not sure if that is what I see in the picture I took. I looked up wiki and I found that picture that the celestial pole is on the other side of the line that I see on my picture. How do I explain it that what I see on the picture I took is really the celestial pole that I saw from Earth standpoint.
 

Attachments

  • earth celestial pole 1.png
    earth celestial pole 1.png
    26.6 KB · Views: 126
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is nothing "celestial" about that. It might be an effect of the atmosphere or, as far as the picture is concerned "astigmatism" in your camera lens.
 
Vi Nguyen said:
I took this picture on 02/21/2010, and I saw a line that I called it celestial pole. But I am not sure if that is what I see in the picture I took. I looked up wiki and I found that picture that the celestial pole is on the other side of the line that I see on my picture. How do I explain it that what I see on the picture I took is really the celestial pole that I saw from Earth standpoint.
What you are seeing in both of your posts is nothing more than water and ice crystals in the upper atmosphere refracting sunlight. You are not seeing anything celestial apart from the Sun's usual disc on a clear day.

-Dan
 
The reason I am thinking that I am seeing the celestial pole in the picture that I took, because when I compare my picture with wiki picture, this is what I am seeing.
I took the picture with my camera that has two lens. At the moment, I point straight at the sun to take this picture. So as it view from Earth standpoint, the celestial pole is on the other side of the Earth as the sun reflect it.
 

Attachments

  • earth my pix.jpg
    earth my pix.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 122
If the pole were actually phyiscal then it might reflect, I suppose. But there is no physical manifestation of an axis running through the Earth.

It would be fun, though.

-Dan
 
I heard of the Earth axial tilt or obliquity and the Earth circle around the sun accordingly to the Earth axial tilt.
But I never heard of the sun has the reflection of the Earth axial tilt.
I am curious.
 
Vi Nguyen said:
I heard of the Earth axial tilt or obliquity and the Earth circle around the sun accordingly to the Earth axial tilt.
But I never heard of the sun has the reflection of the Earth axial tilt.
I am curious.
You haven't heard of it for a very good reason: There is no reflection because there isn't anything to reflect from. I have already told you this in this very thread. I don't know why you are persisting in this.

-Dan
 
  • #10
topsquark said:
What you are seeing in both of your posts is nothing more than water and ice crystals in the upper atmosphere refracting sunlight.

It was water? I thought it was fire since it was sunlight.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top