Identifying Different Radioactive Balls Easily

  • Thread starter Thread starter dark_vader93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Radioactive
AI Thread Summary
Two radioactive balls of the same radius and weight, covered with an absorbing layer, can be differentiated based on their half-lives. Measuring their densities in water is suggested as a straightforward method, where the ball with the longer half-life would sink faster. Another proposed method involves spinning the balls to observe changes in their moment of inertia due to the absorbing layer. The discussion also touches on the non-linear decay rates observed over time, with varying patterns noted in decay behavior. Overall, the focus is on practical methods to identify the balls based on their physical properties.
dark_vader93
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
There are 2 radioactive balls, which have the same radius and the same weight. They are covered with absorbing layer. They are made of diffrent materials, with other half-life. What is the easiest way to recognise which is which?
I had searched for the answer for a longer time and could not find out. Please for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by an absorbing layer? Do you mean the layer absorbs all of the radiated particles and energy from the radioactivity?
 
You could, in principle, measure a change in densities somehow? ( Hint.)
 
If you had the 2 balls with different levels of radiactivity immersed ( frak - I had to look up how to spell that word ) in separate baths of water in inslolated containers each with thermal instrumentation, could you devise a way to tell them apart?
 
thank you very much. that's a great idea to measure their densities or temperatures. i think, that one with density is the easiest one. you put them in water and the ball which has longer half-life would move down faster.
 
Last edited:
daveb said:
What do you mean by an absorbing layer? Do you mean the layer absorbs all of the radiated particles and energy from the radioactivity?

yes.
 
dark_vader93 said:
thank you very much. that's a great idea to measure their densities or temperatures. i think, that one with density is the easiest one. you put them in water and the ball which has longer half-life would move down faster.

But remember, the problem, I think, demands that all products of the reaction stay within the ball. So how would you measures density change and 'which' densities would change?
 
I vote for spinning the ball. If there is a layer (like skin) absorbing the radiated particles, then the moment of inertia of the balls should change at different rates.
 
Matterwave said:
I vote for spinning the ball. If there is a layer (like skin) absorbing the radiated particles, then the moment of inertia of the balls should change at different rates.

Go for it my son.
 
  • #10
My g/f says I have two radioactive balls. ;-)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
How fast are they decaying?
 
  • #12
> How fast are they decaying?

Pretty fast these days. The interesting thing is that the decay rate is highly non-linear lately. I observed no decay in the first 20 years, a linear decay in the next ten years, somewhat of a geometric rate in years 30- 40, but since year 40 the rate appears to be exponential.

I have no rational explanation for my observations.
 
  • #13
Use it or lose it my friend. No reason for things to fizzle out before the age of ninety!
 
Back
Top