If Hackers Are So Skilled, Why Not Make $$$ w/ a Real Job?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hackers Job
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the motivations behind individuals choosing to engage in hacking and cybercrime rather than pursuing legitimate careers in programming or security consulting, which are typically well-paying. It highlights that many hackers may already have programming jobs but opt for criminal activities due to the potential for higher earnings with less effort. The conversation also touches on the misconception that hackers are always highly skilled programmers; many are simply using tools created by others, akin to graffiti artists. The ease of committing cybercrimes, such as high-profile bank heists, is emphasized, suggesting that the allure of quick, substantial financial gain can overshadow the risks involved. Additionally, some hackers are driven by social justice motives rather than financial gain. The discussion contrasts the media's portrayal of hackers with the reality, noting that many so-called hackers are inexperienced and rely on scripts. Overall, the dialogue illustrates the complex motivations and realities of individuals in the hacking community, questioning why they might choose a path of crime over legitimate employment.
kyphysics
Messages
684
Reaction score
445
Always wondered about this.

Why not just program or do security consulting?

Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
Physics news on Phys.org
By "hacker" you mean the umbrella term for people misusing their network access?

Many of them do actually have real programming jobs, they are following their criminal life as a sideline: but many are kids using bots made by other people ... the network equivalent of graffiti artists.
So you may as well be asking "if graffiti artists are so good, why not make loads of money as a real artist?"
Or maybe: if meth lab chemists are such good scientists, why not make loads of money as an industrial chemist rather than be criminals?

Then there is the issue: major hackers are criminals who are making lots of money off botnets and various scams, or they are employed by people who are making all that money. They do it because they are making more money with less effort than they would security consulting.

Contrary to what movies and TV tell you, the average "hacker" is not some wiz programmer turning their skills to evil for the lulz.
 
  • Like
Likes Hoophy, DrClaude, MexChemE and 3 others
Being a criminal is typically easier.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
kyphysics said:
Why not just program or do security consulting?
Who says they don't do both?

Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?

Because http://www.pcworld.com/article/2082204/crime-pays-very-well-cryptolocker-grosses-up-to-30-million-in-ransom.html?
Or because it's not about money, a lot of hacking seems to be done out of a sense of social justice (rightly or wrongly), like the Panama papers or the upcoming Wikileak that'll (supposedly) incriminate Hillary Clinton.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
Oh ... and being highly skilled does not guarantee you a high paying job.
Highly skilled and no job does guarantee you lots of free time though...
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
Cons and criminals working in groups. A random group of teens could be considered to have a collective high-skill set that is comparable to that of one hacker. Being one hacker implies at least an average intelligence. These people that have tried to persuade me over the phone (in broken english) to let them upgrade my PC are off their rockers.
 
kyphysics said:
Always wondered about this.

Why not just program or do security consulting?

Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?
You probably missed this story:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/philipp...hacking-of-bangladesh-bank-account-1457887306

A group of hackers managed to transfer more than $80 million from Bangladeshi accounts held at the US Federal Reserve to other bank accounts in the Philippines and at least one account in Sri Lanka. Almost $1 billion in other attempted transfers were blocked by the Fed's security system.

The hackers used an internal messaging system of the Fed to make the transfers, and presented the correct passwords and authentication codes. Apparently what tripped the hackers up was that they were transferring the stolen funds to personal accounts overseas, rather than to commercial accounts.

Even getting away with only $80 million tax-free would be quite a coup. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
Back in college a friend of mine was talking about comic books. He asked, "Why doesn't the bad guy who makes the superweapon sell it to the government?"
 
  • Like
Likes StatGuy2000, russ_watters and Pepper Mint
kyphysics said:
Why not just program or do security consulting?
Those jobs are pretty good pay, right? Why do they become criminals?
You think governments around the world do not "hack" into foreign country systems.
Lawful employment is available.
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja and billy_joule
  • #11
SteamKing said:
The hackers used an internal messaging system of the Fed to make the transfers, and presented the correct passwords and authentication codes. Apparently what tripped the hackers up was that they were transferring the stolen funds to personal accounts overseas, rather than to commercial accounts.
I read recently, (Don't remember site but it was a "Mainstream" news feed) that another tip off was a glaringly obvious case of misspelling one word. Interesting that someone or group was "good enough" to hack the passwords yet couldn't keep their grammar straight.
 
  • #12
1oldman2 said:
I read recently, (Don't remember site but it was a "Mainstream" news feed) that another tip off was a glaringly obvious case of misspelling one word. Interesting that someone or group was "good enough" to hack the passwords yet couldn't keep their grammar straight.
A lot of the run-of-the-mill fishing scams have this flaw, like misspelling the word "bank" or something stupid.

The Fed heist was apparently a lot more sophisticated if the hackers had access to internal security codes and passwords.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #13
A few groups make a headlining score (or get caught doing it) and everyone thinks they can do it too ... like hearing jackpot bells in a casino.

It should probably be pointed out that the media use of "hacker" includes teenagers with a script - we used to call these script kiddies - and such like, while programmers tend to think of hackers closer to the gnu/usernet useage.
ie. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/hacker

When I studied computer science at college, the terms was used to refer to people who coded by the seat of their pants, without a plan or a diagram etc.
The implication is that the result is not good code ... as in "cobbled together". However, elsewhere the term referred to competence and an attitude of inquirey... as in "I can hack it."
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
  • #14
russ_watters said:
Being a criminal is typically easier.

Is it that easy to steal millions of bucks and get away with it through hacking?
Simon Bridge said:
A few groups make a headlining score (or get caught doing it) and everyone thinks they can do it too ... like hearing jackpot bells in a casino.

It should probably be pointed out that the media use of "hacker" includes teenagers with a script - we used to call these script kiddies - and such like, while programmers tend to think of hackers closer to the gnu/usernet useage.
ie. http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/hacker

When I studied computer science at college, the terms was used to refer to people who coded by the seat of their pants, without a plan or a diagram etc.
The implication is that the result is not good code ... as in "cobbled together". However, elsewhere the term referred to competence and an attitude of inquirey... as in "I can hack it."

What level of education would a typical hacker need, in order to hack, say, the U.S. government's information?
 
  • #15
1oldman2 said:
I read recently, (Don't remember site but it was a "Mainstream" news feed) that another tip off was a glaringly obvious case of misspelling one word. Interesting that someone or group was "good enough" to hack the passwords yet couldn't keep their grammar straight.
SteamKing said:
A lot of the run-of-the-mill fishing scams have this flaw, like misspelling the word "bank" or something stupid.
This can be done on purpose. Only a tiny fraction is stupid enough to be of value for the mail senders - they don't want to waste time with all the others who might react to a better written mail, but ultimately not reveal anything of worth.

@kyphysics: we don't give career guidance for illegal activities.
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja

Similar threads

Back
Top