I If I clap once to a wall, and then walk forward, will I hear an echo?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter phantomvommand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Echo Wall
AI Thread Summary
Clapping towards a reflective wall does not create constructive interference at a point Y due to the nature of sound pulses; the echo arrives after the original sound has already passed. The discussion emphasizes that for interference effects to occur, a continuous tone is necessary rather than a brief pulse, as the latter does not allow for overlapping sound waves. The speed of sound means that the reflected sound will likely propagate past point Y before reaching it, preventing any potential amplification from interference. The concept of sound interference is better illustrated in environments with multiple reflective surfaces, such as between two parallel walls or in elliptical structures. Overall, achieving constructive interference from a clap and its echo in a simple wall scenario is not feasible.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
This is a diagram:
------------ reflective wall
X --> Y

I stand at position X and clap towards a reflective wall. Theoretically, could I walk to some point Y, where there is constructive interference between my clap and the reflected clap, resulting in my hearing a much louder sound. Is this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The clap is just a pulse of sound, so the returning echo has nothing to interfere with when it gets back to you. The echo will not be enhanced by changing position.
 
tech99 said:
The clap is just a pulse of sound, so the returning echo has nothing to interfere with when it gets back to you. The echo will not be enhanced by changing position.
If the pulse were sent in all directions, can’t I say there is a horizontal direction and another towards the wall, which can interfere to form an echo?
Or do you mean that pulses fundamentally cannot interfere? May I know why not? Thanks so much
 
In order to distinguish an echo, the pulse must be short. So the original pulse has left you when the echo reaches you. So no interference.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
If you want interference like this then you need to broadcast a continuous tone, not a brief pulse of sound.
 
  • Like
Likes tkyoung75, hutchphd and phantomvommand
And if you listen to modulation of the two tones (outgoing vs. reflected) it will tell you how fast you are walking at the wall!
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
phantomvommand said:
If the pulse were sent in all directions, can’t I say there is a horizontal direction and another towards the wall, which can interfere to form an echo?
Or do you mean that pulses fundamentally cannot interfere? May I know why not? Thanks so much
The problem with multipath in this situation is as others have said, it is an impulse. With just one wall, the path length to the wall and back will form two sides of a triangle, and the distance between your clap position and your "listening" position will be the 3rd side of the triangle. And we know that 2 sides of a triangle have to be a longer total distance than the 3rd, right?

Instead, ask what happens if you are between two parallel walls, and set up a microphone a distance away from you along a path that is also parallel to the two walls. When you clap you will hear a first clap from the microphone when your clap sound makes it there on the direct path. Then a little later you will hear the result of the two reflected claps arriving at the microphone. What do you think that 2nd event will sound like? Do you think you can fine-tune some positions to get different interference effects? It might be fun to try.

Also look at the sound pressure plots from claps to understand what the propagating waveform looks like...

1629922547556.png

https://www.acoustics.asn.au/journal/2013/2013_41_2_Fletcher_paper.pdf

Also, for a very fun experiment, try to find a long tube about 50 meters long that is closed at the other end and is about a meter in diameter. When you clap into the open tube end, you get a very surprising echo a short time later. I first encountered this at the Exploratorium in San Francisco a number of years ago. :smile:

Edit/Update -- Here is the Exploratorium exhibit I was referring to. They recently moved the Exploratorium so now the exhibit looks like it's outdoors:

https://www.exploratorium.edu/exhibits/echo-tubes

1629988280348.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dale, PeroK and Delta2
hutchphd said:
And if you listen to modulation of the two tones (outgoing vs. reflected) it will tell you how fast you are walking at the wall!

but he isn't walking "at the wall" he's walking parallel to the wall X ----> Y

phantomvommand said:
Theoretically, could I walk to some point Y,

Depending on distance between you and the wall and the distance between X and Y, the reflected, the reflected sound is likely to have propagated out past Y before you get there ... speed of sound is fast ! ~ 340 metres/sec (@15deg C)

so how about redefining your diagram with some real numbers :smile:
 
berkeman said:
I first encountered this at the Exploratorium in San Francisco a number of years ago. :smile:
I always associate San Francisco with free love, drugs and rock and roll. It seems you can discover physics there too!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes berkeman and anorlunda
  • #10
phantomvommand said:
This is a diagram:
------------ reflective wall
X --> Y

I stand at position X and clap towards a reflective wall. Theoretically, could I walk to some point Y, where there is constructive interference between my clap and the reflected clap, resulting in my hearing a much louder sound. Is this possible?

It's possible with a curved wall.
 
  • #11
davenn said:
but he isn't walking "at the wall" he's walking parallel to the wall X ----> Y
Depending on distance between you and the wall and the distance between X and Y, the reflected, the reflected sound is likely to have propagated out past Y before you get there ... speed of sound is fast ! ~ 340 metres/sec (@15deg C)

so how about redefining your diagram with some real numbers :smile:
Even if I got to point Y somehow, the 2 pulses will reach at different times, so I don't suppose I'll get interference...
 
  • #12
A.T. said:
It's possible with a curved wall.
How so? The 2 pulses will never interfere since they will never reach at the same time due to different path lengths
 
  • #13
If we use a pulse we create a traveling wave and there is a flow of energy and information and the distance can be found. But with a continuous tone, the outward and return signals create a standing wave and then there is no flow of energy or information. That is why this acoustic radar cannot ascertain distance if we use a continuous wave and cannot exploit standing waves if we employ a pulse.
 
  • #14
davenn said:
but he isn't walking "at the wall" he's walking parallel to the wall X ----> Y

phantomvommand said:
This is a diagram:
------------ reflective wall
X --> Y

I stand at position X and clap towards a reflective wall. Theoretically, could I walk to some point Y, where there is constructive interference between my clap and the reflected clap, resulting in my hearing a much louder sound. Is this possible?
Wow, that's interesting.
I look at that diagram and assume that the dotted line represents his path towards the wall from position X to position Y. You may well be correct but only the OP knows for sure!
 
  • #15
Also the whispering gallery should be mentioned. The Mormon Temple in Salt Lake is one example of this use of an ellipsoid. The architects at Cornell used to host a Spring Festival on t he quad...somebody built a big semi-ellipse positive pressure inflatable to demonstrate...it was quite remarkable and apparently unforgettable.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #16
hutchphd said:
Also the whispering gallery should be mentioned. The Mormon Temple in Salt Lake is one example of this use of an ellipsoid. The architects at Cornell used to host a Spring Festival on t he quad...somebody built a big semi-ellipse positive pressure inflatable to demonstrate...it was quite remarkable and apparently unforgettable.
Yeah, there was another exhibit at the Exploratorium like that. Two large reflecting bowls (each about 3 meters tall) placed about 30 meters apart. If you sat in the well-placed chairs at the foci, you could talk to your partner at the other station with just whispers. Pretty cool. :smile:

Edit -- Looks like they've moved that exhibit outdoors (they moved the Exploratorium a year or two ago to one of the piers by the Bay):

https://www.exploratorium.edu/exhibits/archimedes

1629988098266.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #17
phantomvommand said:
How so? The 2 pulses will never interfere since they will never reach at the same time due to different path lengths
320px-Ellipse_Animation.gif
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #18
A.T. said:
Yes, thanks. I expect that for the ellipse one would hear 1 pulse first due to the direct transmission from focus 1 to 2 along a horizontal straight line without any reflection, and then a second echo that is much louder due to the constructive interference from all the pulses reflecting off the ellipse?
 
Last edited:
  • #19
It sounds like you think of these pulses as packets, like projectiles. If you think of the source and the echo in terms of spreading and interfering wave fronts, does that make it clearer?

1630008239312.png
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
  • #20
phantomvommand said:
Yes, thanks. I expect that for the ellipse one would hear 1 pulse first due to the direct transmission from focus 1 to 2 along a horizontal straight line without any reflection, and then a second echo that is much louder due to the constructive interference from all the pulses reflecting off the ellipse?
Yes.

 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #21
Just for fun. The reflections in an ellipse starting midway between the focus points:

 
  • #22
I was once in the center of a radome, like the one below. It's a bizarre experience when you talk, and hear a slightly delayed very loud echo, that also repeats. You should be able to reproduce this with a mic, loudspeakers and some delay in between.

320px-Radom_in_Wachtberg_R0011691.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top