If I is open interval, prove I is an open set

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Set
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 10K views
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Is this a good-enough proof? I could have used neighborhoods to show this, but it seems like this way is a bit easier.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110911_113143.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have really only changed the problem from showing that one set is open to showing that two are closed; you'll need to use neighborhoods either way. Much simpler to just take [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex] (assuming [itex]a < b[/itex]) and take [itex]r[/itex] to be the minimum of [itex]b-x[/itex] and [itex]x-a[/itex] so that [itex]x - r >= x - (x-a) = a[/itex] and [itex]x + r <= x + (b-x) = b[/itex]. Then [itex](x-r, x+r) \subset (a,b)[/itex] holds so that [itex]x[/itex] is an interior point of [itex](a,b)[/itex].
 
gauss^2 said:
You have really only changed the problem from showing that one set is open to showing that two are closed; you'll need to use neighborhoods either way. Much simpler to just take [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex] (assuming [itex]a < b[/itex]), take [itex]r[/itex] to be the minimum of [itex]b-x[/itex] and [itex]x-a[/itex] so that [itex]x - r >= x - (x-a) = a[/itex] and [itex]x + r <= x + (b-x) = b[/itex]. Then [itex](x-r, x+r) \subset (a,b)[/itex] holds so that [itex]x[/itex] is an interior point of [itex](a,b)[/itex].

Well, I also used the fact that if one set is open, its complement is closed. I suppose that's not enough, though.

The professor suggested the method you just did.