If I is open interval, prove I is an open set

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that an open interval I, represented as (a, b), is an open set in the context of real analysis. The proof utilizes the concept of neighborhoods, specifically defining r as the minimum of b-x and x-a for any x within the interval. This approach confirms that (x-r, x+r) is a subset of (a, b), establishing x as an interior point of the interval. Additionally, the relationship between open and closed sets is acknowledged, emphasizing that if one set is open, its complement is closed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open and closed sets in topology
  • Familiarity with neighborhoods in real analysis
  • Basic knowledge of intervals in the real number system
  • Concept of interior points in a set
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of open and closed sets in topology
  • Learn about the concept of neighborhoods and their applications in real analysis
  • Explore the relationship between open intervals and their complements
  • Investigate proofs involving interior points and their significance in set theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and topology, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of set properties and proofs.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Is this a good-enough proof? I could have used neighborhoods to show this, but it seems like this way is a bit easier.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110911_113143.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have really only changed the problem from showing that one set is open to showing that two are closed; you'll need to use neighborhoods either way. Much simpler to just take [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex] (assuming [itex]a < b[/itex]) and take [itex]r[/itex] to be the minimum of [itex]b-x[/itex] and [itex]x-a[/itex] so that [itex]x - r >= x - (x-a) = a[/itex] and [itex]x + r <= x + (b-x) = b[/itex]. Then [itex](x-r, x+r) \subset (a,b)[/itex] holds so that [itex]x[/itex] is an interior point of [itex](a,b)[/itex].
 
gauss^2 said:
You have really only changed the problem from showing that one set is open to showing that two are closed; you'll need to use neighborhoods either way. Much simpler to just take [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex] (assuming [itex]a < b[/itex]), take [itex]r[/itex] to be the minimum of [itex]b-x[/itex] and [itex]x-a[/itex] so that [itex]x - r >= x - (x-a) = a[/itex] and [itex]x + r <= x + (b-x) = b[/itex]. Then [itex](x-r, x+r) \subset (a,b)[/itex] holds so that [itex]x[/itex] is an interior point of [itex](a,b)[/itex].

Well, I also used the fact that if one set is open, its complement is closed. I suppose that's not enough, though.

The professor suggested the method you just did.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K