What are the Limits of N* with c in Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of neighborhoods and accumulation points in analysis, specifically focusing on the limits of deleted neighborhoods (N*) with respect to accumulation points (c). Participants are examining examples and counterexamples related to these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are sharing examples and counterexamples to clarify their understanding of the concepts. There are questions regarding the clarity of shared materials, and some participants express uncertainty about the original poster's work.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing feedback on the clarity of the original poster's submissions. There is mention of a professor's input on a related problem, suggesting that some guidance has been provided, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's claims.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the quality of shared images and the clarity of written work, which may be affecting the discussion. Participants emphasize the importance of clear communication for effective assistance.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
I'm not sure about my work.

N = neighborhood
N* = deleted neighborhood
c = accumulation point


http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20111011_224646.jpg

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20111011_224704.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one looks fine, but here's a simpler counterexample:
f(x) = \left\{ <br /> \begin{array}{l l}<br /> 1 &amp; \quad \mbox{x = 1}\\<br /> 0 &amp; \quad \mbox{otherwise}\\ \end{array} \right.
 
For the other one, your scan is so dark and of such poor quality that I can't read it.
 
Mark44 said:
For the other one, your scan is so dark and of such poor quality that I can't read it.

You should be able to zoom in. If that doesn't work, I'll take another picture.
 
Shackleford said:
You should be able to zoom in. If that doesn't work, I'll take another picture.
It's also difficult to read your writing. It would be better if you just entered what you have as text.

Frankly, if you want us to help with your work, it behooves you to make it as easy as possible for us to do so. Whenever someone posts a picture of their work, and I have to click a link to see a scanned photo of it, I really don't feel much like putting in a lot of effort to decipher what's there.
 
The professor worked the second problem in class today. I had the the right idea, but he did it a bit more rigorously.

This next picture should be clear enough. I said this is false.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/rsz_img_20111012_151514.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K